From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44180: 28.0.50; Emacs frames won't redisplay unless resized Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:24:21 +0100 Message-ID: <9ee49070-b0be-a775-18a2-3c9ee587210b@gmx.at> References: <87wnzgkdsj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83k0vgiyub.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0vgkbgq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83eeloivgc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lffw1wjv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <7f32498b-1293-f1ee-5636-8ddd5bbff6c1@gmx.at> <87h7qjpeam.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <831rhmgx6x.fsf@gnu.org> <874kmipa5r.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37703"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44180@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 26 19:30:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7Fv-0009fx-Dx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:30:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7Fr-0006rI-S8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7B0-0002WE-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57987) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7B0-0000Y0-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7B0-0004AS-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44180.160373667815971 (code B ref 44180); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2020 18:24:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7Ac-00049X-0Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kX7Ab-00049K-3M for 44180@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:24:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603736662; bh=TI9DK800CECo7/etWkgvAHgTp47RMNDgQK/3QzppPMg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ismB6/8lYUJz5WhocP3lChAncAyJ+VPwzFGxAceI9O0ZO5TmGIW34XTCQiOLtWb7i Y4QOslh8kndyBeIrjHikCzLaFUqAJE4J/i/vJz7qAUC1gdm1ogT6rNg/QZ6djunuIp mkcjONPfVkHre6copajBPvtYORCZT5vWXuDfyHA8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.219]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPGRz-1klCAd001V-00Pdbi; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:24:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874kmipa5r.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:c6NPfTjvZW0aQ8VaplVH6EkrGiPiMsSgTk0leYauqSYN2jQyMMQ Y2J4IuAbQHcBJg2PGQ0z5Q81Lf4MnbOaVeGP4S77UkaI0ZrxB2Hp8Ex8jVKDDxGrdEEhZMb g8AkxIRl4VPmGYvaUENbtYytqzNvyWEZ/pGpwdobydNAzrXz6Za+WUaPSAibu+3NoHx764j z7AMEwf99Qy+q4IZRjJjw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:zJIJcqDIZSA=:UduEEEPWeQOnT5M1VeDRTw LD7qWV6p/p+Hdhf1WwHpPaKn4MM75TFXmqxOv25ZN9y/f6SMmwx2lbOei73U07zuhaoX3qhhR MyK2e9OCc5KL3S5FBcnSqy8dMZCm4dC7Bd7jZE85ZIpT1isNjGLiHBm1+w9aGS4UsASsiPTSg 0+ZJHf97m/wwSk0HwSGS16TKuKKjADyXZsS3Q5t4Ag7v6PVIAOaogUQMCUohylET4GeDIeJ05 Os5oM7qKet1Nbg60DwEYjab+62k0SWM3YTXSHlJj58MajfpaPFYPqUonsYtBtgi6sGRM9OhKm Mi8jCyrjkLVa57r6RVbIwMn5o0UQbXtZVwJvzYq8TRPWIHQo8wi+1xbWxom0UjA6V1WssZqOs NUwMBfvN4BZ+XlP15DuTy11byO3OBCpvJ9ig3FNf5f2MV3I5smwz9Pt7B19AIi5QvrDIAH9RG DNqb9x7uZxg39+Zc3uasl4fb+KTfKQRXWHU6MvZ9HJmK54T5sa29a9emPvXhV0LkPijqf78Gt IoP4/iFCeH8OParJ8E7AENNrGpClpcOaX8JVaxF90PGnP4NnTpUKca3KL+NAq18AzQHpUsF/a 9Eh6Tv/BHTjthNvdZ1BYKeV5E3lkJX+jvTyiDgnzdMtXJqDbRTDFQ11PS6gg+a7F6C/SZLGv2 daGskOx1C+hHp1Xtd+pL0L5kKS8jbk4AXrlMoHOSNbc4GCNt+1BfLW8DTFg96QmKwqHlp7dpB juOLBqemIcsNseLJTR+i1GdfhfVxtKCrDeUSiGHaUJf5pKu117HaPV65TpYcX0x90WHHOjnv X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191625 Archived-At: > The problem is that switching focus between windows (frames) does not > update which window is "live". The most-recently created, or > most-recently resized, window is always the live one. If I switch focus > to one of the other frames, it doesn't update, and I need to move it > around somehow in order to make it live. Then the other frames go dead. > > Before the breakage, it's possible that the non-visible frames were not > updated while they remained invisible, and I simply never knew because > I couldn't see them. Now they stay un-updated until I manipulate the > size of the window somehow. Do you get the corresponding focus events (whatever they are now) when you make another frame the fullscreen one? If so, we should probably redraw the frame in that case. martin