From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:56:03 +0300 Message-ID: <9ea1c445-a21e-8ac7-faae-49e01c7d4d12@yandex.ru> References: <87ee3d4cli.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0d35c82.fsf@gnus.org> <877d92unqn.fsf@posteo.net> <83bkyednvx.fsf@gnu.org> <87cziudmyg.fsf@posteo.net> <838rtheogd.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilskbgul.fsf@posteo.net> <83ilskcp9i.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8whio1a.fsf@posteo.net> <83czipkylw.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmmp9c63.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8wgk7tn.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfrk3b86.fsf@posteo.net> <834k0ovket.fsf@gnu.org> <5eb376b4-5f7e-6b00-286a-8bd0950dae22@yandex.ru> <83pmjbrsiu.fsf@gnu.org> <6dd7e47d-4115-7e2c-4ee0-d4e00f684a90@yandex.ru> <83ilp2sljp.fsf@gnu.org> <835yl2rrl1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39738"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Cc: 54296@debbugs.gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, larsi@gnus.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 18:30:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o1Vud-000ACZ-NG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:30:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o1Vuc-0000pU-AU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o1VOB-0008Of-GY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o1VOA-00089i-8D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o1VOA-0003kV-7K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 54296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54296.165530857514351 (code B ref 54296); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2022 15:56:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o1VNO-0003jN-Qa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:56:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:39860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o1VNM-0003j6-KG for 54296@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id y19so24126787ejq.6 for <54296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=P/Sjjazpj+QJ2C5oZNSv/3XihrxVJxFwBDMAYOMVtLo=; b=PTmFWxMXry4hWB9pLfHZY4/863ndAA82ZUYWAL3Ltdh9BaCNZMg4dOXl3phpw+Togw iUfyp+a/JqZ+E/1RBewXGQp6QUfI3l4GSQwHLWD8fXVXexlhlyDc5iUKVItredxGU0aJ 6YeHgSBCuIQ2M5z/kp0UY3NU44067hITC6ZAu7y952uHfYNMvCcYnIY2tDnYis9jrFk9 7eTfp45iVNlkf/9aM81lJRkofmJybPPfgTt3lRngY5EFdKDrk3RfoPuSaJ/TIpv65hOr 6pMVJneR5pDGKfmzK8Nu2lX1iOxJ77oHxGV0fQKVFKZwMHrANiIHwb/TgKwcCQQBU/SP HpPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=P/Sjjazpj+QJ2C5oZNSv/3XihrxVJxFwBDMAYOMVtLo=; b=NVkUvjJKaa31U0WmMLbrrejPineQGEAhFHVBJDVevYMwtK/Bi54ioscSlqm4sTOhQ/ 8pgvb+QToF7nbF8LHnxL2L6WiWZ08JyuAVpau3Ky6uGry7GGHZYAh8hLBZEW1oyh7XXP 9JUA7faYrv3bw3iqoqqgp84gllN+vJ7Yz+/a0u6kFbbE9e4AXK4QL8lxDAmy+CLQYlpG iPKG+7LmMKFyFAMm8CjPxV3c5LijBAwcDmOBVo98sHsQw335HCda//VVu/MvCmmOwqEv zsAgQKcwe48cSpURDNVZZUaHA2FvrXnzlZtH76Su8EBHuNYh+nH3hxWb8TsqZ21sQLVV 5Ekg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora99ugJcFkK1myVqLrYmIjyrlcsAWRqrA4WNNAvlfrzEPoT60SgK cvm3DmMLpeJU2+HqcUM8x1s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sqw2xB6UMdJetZC5U2GsrQVP186bENdsQXogv5jO4biHcekCT9I/c6d5k7RHf/tUGz0v6LmA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5a4d:b0:70f:7d1c:664b with SMTP id my13-20020a1709065a4d00b0070f7d1c664bmr452407ejc.540.1655308566665; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.236.48] ([173.237.64.48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z12-20020a05640240cc00b0042aa5a74598sm10154158edb.52.2022.06.15.08.56.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <835yl2rrl1.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:234590 Archived-At: On 15.06.2022 16:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Then I'm sorry, but I don't think I have anything to do with that > change. If I somehow cause Philip to make such changes, I apologize, > because I never meant anything even close (and cannot understand how > what I wrote could have interpreted to that effect, but that's water > under the bridge). That's easy to fix, but: > Once again, my only comment about the code was that I thought (and > still think) we should not use major-mode matching, but derived-mode > matching instead. A lot of my emails in this thread are about "we should not use major-mode matching". That we maybe should. Because we do.