From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61514: 30.0.50; sadistically long xml line hangs emacs Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:59:59 +0000 Message-ID: <9e9ed8043f2342b86537@heytings.org> References: <87lel0c65v.fsf@everybody.org> <0f053182b05e84d6251e@heytings.org> <6ec29aa7157c40ce76e9e0cf1a6351871e16ecd7.camel@everybody.org> <9e9ed8043f6ceff84cfc@heytings.org> <87h6vntef0.fsf@yahoo.com> <9e9ed8043f2db866e3ba@heytings.org> <87cz6btd3q.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="549"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , 61514@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 12:01:49 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFXo-000AYJ-7s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:01:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFXb-0000mL-KZ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFXM-0000je-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:01:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFX4-0001BV-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFX4-00084r-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61514 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61514-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61514.167645880430900 (code B ref 61514); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61514) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2023 11:00:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFW8-00082J-C1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:57798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFW5-00081J-DL for 61514@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:00:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676458800; bh=NvpZ/kIdaTQAmmtGcfK3fnKZur4e3nG1/lEBHho+aTg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=TlL1clMj7rhTCGHrfgY7St09iCg4rTG7rGi76fXku64zIIWErivhFrEFWMX3j0a7R 3nQWUBYlSDnDBHBcIojVdvnrM7upuKT0FBEJbBOYb9ZFYbNRCSTIMgO0Tv/w7OJoHz eOHLrR6JrLbKPEx7Q9HlHQGxRPYMOhQ3Iud/AF0g4AEFzs1iDIm7g7dQ/fcHsX6dTT oTeNnbKU2lHbV5zvTNjqzT320U9cdp1IG7tdZqDP7wLyFyirtbMunL3wFaJkF5b4uX AB5tMhk82jYvDOuzHNxrOiygwMbnA0BNiaiouiD8dbZNbc6b43e8dlTJP1Nw1FI9ot BfACA/vzDshXQ== In-Reply-To: <87cz6btd3q.fsf@yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255678 Archived-At: >>>> Nobody is saying that there is no bug here. I was only pointing out >>>> that the bug is not "in Emacs", it is in the fontification routines >>>> of a specific mode. If you turn fontification off, you will see that >>>> Emacs 30 behaves much better than Emacs 28. >>> >>> And when that mode is part of Emacs, the bug is in Emacs. >> >> That remark misses the context and the point. > > The context is that you dismissed a bug in nxml because it cannot be > reproduced in fundamental-mode. > That's not the context, no. Nor did I dismiss a bug, read the first sentence above: "Nobody is saying that there is no bug here." Nor did fundamental-mode play any role whatsoever in this discussion.