From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: M-p in diff-mode jumps too far Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 02:24:43 +0300 Message-ID: <9dba6552-cd54-c6f0-18de-6822d43b0944@yandex.ru> References: <87a8aydxe4.fsf@gmail.com> <3c2e407b-8ba2-1791-15e6-a0be6dac2897@yandex.ru> <87fuknzem8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d1frzcil.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <877f5yza02.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484695518 7317 195.159.176.226 (17 Jan 2017 23:25:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:25:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/51.0 Cc: Mark Oteiza , 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, Stefan Monnier , Dima Kogan To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 18 00:25:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7l-0001GJ-Rq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:25:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38294 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7q-0006MN-NA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7i-0006Hi-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:25:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7e-0008SJ-T4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7e-0008SF-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7e-0004os-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148469549418510 (code B ref 25105); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2017 23:24:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7V-0004oT-SV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:24:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com ([209.85.215.65]:33055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cTd7U-0004oE-DE for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:24:52 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f65.google.com with SMTP id x1so12730621lff.0 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:24:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8yRvk8yFxFStuH0lh/LWQReMV0Z5NNQ7s1YGtA+NjKk=; b=BjDUY6URrRKjYrPxNWZu3DqjJaC4oa7q07Su31U0zelLco4kbD9oUrHsRAsIkw6j6K riy/9yRysijkgmHjGQbc0Ro9rEHxtR4WzOTvjcjnWdsaBPJqwutwIKE7HpT438BswFiE d29cwogAz+mSxQ0Tg2g+QKpm31jEVQX1CoCFfVyM6xSLogUQXVsb8wbue8/WqvfzUDrw ff26NABjT+e6E8O6FA36X2XjHnPhiDeFTBZ/w5pYUc/DtC8ZtTZSYiX2NeocF5Fy3mLX I5NtcA4Qynv2P8vyaU663PJQCdakmJOkfqkQagNh6wub1vrvxh4XWVyD5CXf8ivUK19G v9sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8yRvk8yFxFStuH0lh/LWQReMV0Z5NNQ7s1YGtA+NjKk=; b=Z+ywmCQZ07AK9Z/KPU6n84JsJkZnUw7jHJKhNf9Af/LDD5T06HbfTWGkbg/XKKDMNE sPL20qIbirJk27N8/gF3SYcRwJS0xV3gz4glVX0Vcr+rtWlGN2FMXXjw1w392xqv/who 17sIpJmBTw96ErIREm29t8q+bdmohq+Zq9mvha7Hr55h/6ZQjTGfyyMWujJeqPs3xr6O rVfPfTd2DPKA0qA+Q02y9qni7Ik5+uLF48CojvD6wrYRlUEAIBjSXJpAcHjfW6FkdiHX /42iJeFeCFHOx6f+wOXzArfP12cP3QjZNX+bszsnaAlx+cM6ObZDvWfcWSkBQAiE2uLy cumg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKTCzTyHfp8G82ld7oTf33aenb5qbgCoR3EwleC73g8axAnHqYSwcla8jKY17t63w== X-Received: by 10.25.34.196 with SMTP id i187mr52525lfi.176.1484695486392; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:24:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.174] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm9950266lfj.14.2017.01.17.15.24.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:24:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128188 Archived-At: On 16.01.2017 09:26, Tino Calancha wrote: > OK, below is my draft for the second commit. > Please don't hesitate to send me comments to make it more clear or/and > fix some broken grammar. Here's a fresh idea. If we're not going to worry about (not) showing Dima's commit message in the generated change log, maybe the new message should talk about tweaking the code, and not retell the original message. Or the users will read it twice, basically. But only those users that read change logs, of course.