From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33601: 26; Add macro `with-hook-added' Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:50:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9bda9cb4-42bb-4e89-b73e-fb0b62443b6c@default> References: <6871371f-5c46-46f2-9a92-b1c154ec5a73@default> <0b15a9be-6f19-4569-93fd-1a09a6456b25@default> <06d76795115ae2a95f56694a904100ba@webmail.orcon.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543877353 22298 195.159.176.226 (3 Dec 2018 22:49:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33601@debbugs.gnu.org To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 03 23:49:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx1Y-0005hk-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 23:49:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53230 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3f-0004k3-AG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:51:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3W-0004jx-1f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3S-0002RQ-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3O-0002Or-4O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3O-0002cL-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 22:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33601 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33601-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33601.154387746110058 (code B ref 33601); Mon, 03 Dec 2018 22:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33601) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2018 22:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3N-0002c6-9j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:33256) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTx3J-0002bm-RC for 33601@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:50:58 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wB3MmmKq051412; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:50:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=qZ2/E91RktHEdEY9lZtRh1qWqJ5k9Sf2NRdp9guK9rA=; b=fCYBxAriDbvvx2Ee1/SPAxgWNlpdJfxnAur32UAMMPA22NAwRGFsB4M4afpw6RI21aeJ 3jCK8q74ylca7uxTzOLV28yQwkR62OxqAfAkJ4uB42YVpZcZ1TzxB2IJOT7CXQS7WKRt bO+EnrmJ6+D+0xsleZp4Q8gvGr16VI95ICOlQaSyUW7JRHT+/ZZDimwzx8EQr40NFWD6 DtZdsDvwgvzOiz2KU7iRxd1nW/uqRW4Gme51ZG8Iv+tZJO66xIKZXDrcgHTSX4jJPOmw LAiksEAynobw4neRVtu9G1v55k3pgiIusqg9inYe5EL6gttAfjYY2ZV3UCSFj0z1TbGD 8w== Original-Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2p3hqts8r5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 03 Dec 2018 22:50:51 +0000 Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wB3Monlc008176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:50:50 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wB3Moneh007547; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:50:49 GMT In-Reply-To: <06d76795115ae2a95f56694a904100ba@webmail.orcon.net.nz> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4771.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9096 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812030204 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153039 Archived-At: > > Maybe a better name would be `with-function-on-hook' or > > `with-hook-function-added'. It is the function, not the > > hook, that is added (to the hook). >=20 > True, but `with-hook-added' seems consistent with the name of > `add-hook' itself (which likewise isn't for creating hooks). Yeah, that's why I used that name. I'm OK with any of those names mentioned so far, and probably with other alternatives too. The real question is whether such a macro is useful. I think it can be. I gave a couple examples in bug #33595. It was those examples that made me think such a macro might be useful.