From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Okamsn via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62230: File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed, unlike file "archive-contents" Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:14:54 +0000 Message-ID: <9b97757f-7ae1-ec92-10bc-ea5d4deb5886@protonmail.com> References: <87pm97lr8v.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Okamsn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20272"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62230@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 18 18:16:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pdaAD-00056Q-CK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 18:16:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pdaA0-0008Dv-FD; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pda9y-0008Dl-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pda9y-0002wU-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pda9y-0001az-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Okamsn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62230 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62230-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62230.16791597106064 (code B ref 62230); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62230) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2023 17:15:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pda98-0001Zk-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]:49365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pda95-0001Yt-GT for 62230@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:15:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1679159701; x=1679418901; bh=Bsm7nfvWFqTPC0FHHJw5hzfh5XvMJ2qvPQtCPa07rFY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ftK3FLrhhrodifKRPLxJLagtk5bAImD9W6hnN+Saf786z+kRA9Djj3bcDDZSeOxo8 9uEiPum4vcv8wKNQdsa4eVyg2Uqp5ssY7SZ8x+4uwxb8iTDE70Zi/5vPE0FIrrRxqq P+4PICB2Rcngl5yK0BzP0//nX65lI3BYRRj339SCycrQ46YHf4WDJrbm77WKpB/a5v 4qH+ecWtL1j/ryDZVhMHg0MGDRpQaQS0iypPXYTobtEJQVFQryvDsaEXJThobU5vlo vo0uU19IMuXCokSz4OAy+GSnGb9NgduKxLYeMhlHFdgxasKLpIui56ntSOXbCnZHXM BKjnYAJi9QJiQ== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 25935600:user:proton X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:258190 Archived-At: On 2023-03-18 13:58 UTC, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> It is possible to sign this file with the GNU ELPA key, just like the >>> file "archive-contents", which downloads successfully? >> It should be, but I actually don't know how it is generated or at least >> I am missing something in elpa-admin.el. I have Cc'ed Stefan who should >> know. > > Yes, that was an oversight Should be fixed now, > > > Stefan > The file now downloads successfully. I can see that it also downloaded the signatures. Thank you.