From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48925: [PATCH] Set `minibuffer-completion-*` variables buffer-locally in a few more places Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:22:58 +0000 Message-ID: <993162c2a1e7b3de58bd@heytings.org> References: <87fsxstdiy.fsf@miha-pc> <87czn79smi.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtmbgehx.fsf@miha-pc> <83lf1v0w6y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9518"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, miha@kamnitnik.top, 48925@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 12 01:23:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLZ-0002In-Rg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 01:23:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53526 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLY-0007sz-G3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:23:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLO-0007sj-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLO-0000jT-4V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLN-0000o4-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48925.16366765813091 (code B ref 48925); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2021 00:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLN-0000nn-36 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:59418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlKLL-0000ne-RG for 48925@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:23:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1636676578; bh=KOWZWKHEW6d8kJWLx6c3yR1iOKOZaKgjT6dV56q3j64=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=mHtlS6Xz7gyGj7XPxSYmQOSAloBIfEXWTq9C7vzgOM+CXpibaM5va54PDbnzwv5W3 QRBTRdlFmvLTcUYVRigyT4tUg721uVKpx8joc7qbWGScf4VMbXou84IxI9miHXKLXr KqAz+CG8Db7H9lscpe/ej4EiE82xe9N3xOlVtYS7p1OoT9uAzGcumGMlqi7MlWY4qm SnUnE9gff+2ckiUq2/cuPKCfrfEXvK8XTd0F19ZTjGvZ1MK7ph5dRT18yQpGdkIjrT bd2WkgcV8rl7sIGaWsYWb/tc2yEyB/Hbe+tm6JiFRlHEJ28XLgBjymv6dXGiN6k364 kTQMcknH2pWvg== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:219694 Archived-At: >> What is awkward to do in C? > > We don't have anby facility to create closures from C, so we'd basically > have to call an ELisp function to create the closure. > BTW, these patches would be much simpler and this discussion would not exist with the approach I defended in bug#45474.