From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jean-Christophe Helary Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:45:47 +0900 Message-ID: <98B33B3E-AB18-4BDB-A012-5270F3FCD7C2@gmail.com> References: <93AB3C85-27C1-48FF-8C3D-B90B4CF33670@gmail.com> <83o9up2hli.fsf@gnu.org> <7F0AE9BE-93FF-4CF7-8F76-AE1BD0CFDDDC@gmail.com> <83inkx2eeu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaoxoty1.fsf@rosalinde> <3D9A3600-CF3D-4DD9-866C-CBEE8F692B25@gmail.com> <83o9u5bde1.fsf@gnu.org> <12A8E2CE-F2F5-4DB9-88DE-BCD40513EEBA@gmail.com> <83h8zxb02p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496533576 17927 195.159.176.226 (3 Jun 2017 23:46:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26925@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 04 01:46:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIkD-00047Q-0J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 01:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIkF-0003Hs-36 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:46:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIk9-0003Hl-Nf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIk6-0001YV-Hl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIk6-0001Y4-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIk5-0005on-O0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 26925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26925.149653355922355 (code B ref 26925); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2017 23:45:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54372 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIk1-0005oU-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:34008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHIk0-0005oH-0Y for 26925@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 9so66938072pfj.1 for <26925@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:45:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qmYB5BXT9LmW5IDUc/8+IEFFFRDd8F/lpEFTShMDwmg=; b=VrTaqtUbXXo7P+ywgLNaZcuoJAvYQRYDGrmQodKE3RrLylST96+FXthVhKtabxeKiZ U/BKHANAJeC1yTulQvo6pl7CJ+78sPTQiZLYBn6DkGxsM7NpmdqGAkUpL1ZrIONVk287 0u8Oq704pGDtcikPPcCj2816BLcWLtWCxPkaOUitsBTEcAwF2fN8b1FGQaEJHwdx9bji cuEALdnShv4IzGqy8viCMbbS8/DozstHzqsNm6uIXQbqJvp/lauUq+aiE5lNrjeqGvzI UhgwNOHH/fq/Ta2SSrchR8hL0pUGNVi1l+j4ooJPaDpzxx7rDvCCgQk2il+qxWJG3W8T wnLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qmYB5BXT9LmW5IDUc/8+IEFFFRDd8F/lpEFTShMDwmg=; b=t/iJ7twUNjrSoKNzCeS4ejyOZmM7mte3DExnpHR9OWfBt4iFR3lzyyJ2Z7dGuA+N+3 vf13Jxmj1Jv3mtrfHGuW2uNzynWdzNMsI4VIl1BguWGLacAt18N0+P0AmJ30dYJdgRqv ww5nfLYPviv6pdbtrGnoI62gMQvES33yLCq0+ZududzrcklSrjo32E8zGiIiLc/K5bQl p2ZPIczB305qm6SFRAtlEaOJSSEOp+fkfufNq4LDhono7tQdPPMrjJvzk9hFTOkbITLd USitjSdcecJSU7Ih0a+StwHSC6i94sWjiL1mR6bN4EfX95hci6GmzgMhaPsCdfwD1Nn3 /+GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcA0DqSVTSz1maj4DNAlqPr4n83etbDb8SLX97yzSdEsSm6aB8q6 eIwBaZruz+eKOQ== X-Received: by 10.84.197.3 with SMTP id m3mr7199384pld.40.1496533550302; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.22.136] (p5037-ipbffx02kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp. [61.214.117.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t79sm46097066pfk.106.2017.06.03.16.45.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:45:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83h8zxb02p.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133237 Archived-At: > On 2017/06/03, at 23:46, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >> From: Jean-Christophe Helary >> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:50:55 +0900 >> Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, >> 26925@debbugs.gnu.org >>=20 >>>> -If the optional argument @var{trim} >>>> =E2=86=92 >>>> +If @var{trim} >>>>=20 >>>> just to adapt the text to the description of the other arguments. >>>=20 >>> Thanks, but I see no problem with the current text. We use both >>> styles intermittently. >>=20 >> It's up to you. I thought it was weird that all the other optional = arguments were not labeled as "optional" and only this one. >=20 > That's not what I see: grepping the ELisp manual for "optional > argument" comes up with more than 200 hits. It's quite normal to use > that. I am talking about this function. This function does not use "optional = arguments" for its other optional arguments. Jean-Christophe=20