From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49846: 28.0.50; project-find-regexp results does not open target file Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:13:14 +0300 Message-ID: <9792c9df-3da0-283b-4628-31aedb2d436d@yandex.ru> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24515"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 Cc: 49846@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pankaj Jangid Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 05 15:14:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdCM-0006Ce-7w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdCK-0001QL-Nu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdCE-0001QC-U2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdCE-0004BV-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdCE-0005IP-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49846 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49846-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49846.162816920720310 (code B ref 49846); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49846) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 13:13:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46170 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdBf-0005HW-MG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:42918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBdBa-0005HF-TD for 49846@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 09:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id e25-20020a05600c4b99b0290253418ba0fbso3681362wmp.1 for <49846@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 06:13:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cS0nNTXKxja+ERH9WYZ1CTrWRNDjk5LSj3R73C9GuIU=; b=gen4qtRQT3GsemFllYWyy1wqjEXH2HzqbWmYDE9C3GfWEaMFXgxBjq1H4gWyPddmW5 FgFUsfPhtNMduvLjuM6YBmvxjDPVlZ8mIQ5HyPId5a8sf66uO+kwxbY9lTlWXpnxP9YD 4m4JIGNqyuQwb0F5875q0nMq2lhwAziTe3kc30l2ElUNxPcTrOveV855ayRy8EL8sKXw sxCMyebmGPudNp0ThEJxCmNhaceRCOGN5hFvYtZIUQZaYd2n+Y3O09a0u9OB5uzPaumC UEsI6dgAf4yT9u9pmCY4y/p3aE7wszcKkIgPFr/r93JrlM8lheUwEfpURkOffQA97nbx tC6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cS0nNTXKxja+ERH9WYZ1CTrWRNDjk5LSj3R73C9GuIU=; b=SJBG+nX0cmrOJ7yRY18CY4x/ooL7CXcZDKusEFZIOGhxngIzUY2fYbbQ0aJhia5Thr +BO/zNeNs+9Jrl1P5HhPbsHkdc7Ma9B/PQ8GMHnvMZ5LjnrfSFuV/cOTsS9Jomm2r3TM BxSYbKaElmGeJznGKsKW8SZlZMvOUfXRbAq/0DdWdk2TsD+WpY2DeuqdY+iwEm+fDfFr vIPFTCggGCBss+tg2ONT6RL1xc+/s+07M/B7Pb9aRSFMvg1mbSh5AK9gYbARVXUQ1LCM G3s/B8I+6XKHy0KXTvBJa1qC+fldtJzx4Tj6V1JjQaEyNI2k6XVo2ASWlBISb5kVBqrz ZzqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321wFT4ie3e1YgUwU3aiSY/ind3pARMdeOUhU1s3g83b/tQOnZ+ CCOEabYSUIuzVf/2v0e5CjrG8O3uSkU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztaCdl/bLu4sDswMMsBhJLY9gd8ld8aoBTPruFFoyeMHuSKHXNGFT3eRYXvZjigSo/OH/hnw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7203:: with SMTP id n3mr15104601wmc.104.1628169197073; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 06:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r12sm6527719wrn.31.2021.08.05.06.13.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 06:13:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211231 Archived-At: On 05.08.2021 06:58, Pankaj Jangid wrote: >> To be clear: you position the point on a group name, press RET and see >> this message? That is expected. >> > > Okay. I didn’t know this. Has this change in recently? I remember > hitting on the group and opening the target file. But true, with > multiple results in the group that would be confusing. I don't think this ever was different. >> If we do end up changing this behavior, what would the "suitable >> place" be? The first match in the group? > > There are two options here: > > 1. We just change the message. Something like: "select a match to open". > > 2. In addition to above, we may have a customization variable. Something > like - xref-open-first-match > > For this bug, (1) should be sufficient. 2. probably won't require a user option, there's no real danger in such change. But which of the (1, 2) do you want to happen?