On 8/28/2023 9:47 AM, Jim Porter wrote:
> On 8/28/2023 9:29 AM, Jim Porter wrote:
>> On 8/28/2023 3:27 AM, Michael Albinus wrote:
>>> I've applied the following sledge-hammer patch, which cures the problem
>>> for me. But I'm pretty sure there are better ways in Eshell to fix this.
>>
>> How about something like this? It's a little less invasive (but no 
>> less of a hack).
> 
> Oops, something more like this (let-binding 'tramp-remote-path').

Uh... the third time's the charm I guess? (Sorry for the extra emails.)