From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50179: [PATCH v4] Add support for "bright" ANSI colors to ansi-color and term-mode Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:21:23 -0700 Message-ID: <96ed538e-84da-185c-31c3-2459b0f55168@gmail.com> References: <838s0rvyfu.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgt6vi43.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6l5k9xr.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf4p3210.fsf@gnus.org> <831r6hv51r.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7fc2vd4.fsf@gnus.org> <871r5kpqsj.fsf@gnus.org> <0e61dc90-c315-f3cd-df83-22b9ecb029c1@gmail.com> <87ilysv1a4.fsf@gnus.org> <24dfacb5-067d-580d-2608-8198d9e4f1a3@gmail.com> <87lf3nxb45.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="418"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 23:22:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTWAV-000ATc-0Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 23:22:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45770 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTWAT-0005gT-Vn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTWAM-0005g7-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTWAM-0001Xw-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTWAL-0004X7-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50179.163243209317386 (code B ref 50179); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2021 21:21:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56054 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTW9s-0004WM-Om for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:21:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:40580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTW9q-0004W6-Rg for 50179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id h3so7639995pgb.7 for <50179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HAFpQOdKOy/9tI7BZl8BBWQFvbNN6nRIvdu4Vpi41GY=; b=dhwbnoWY2Mvsy0FYBiEPRY2kyPzHtXKI4HOPGp10ghxs3TqoS2Q+t/QoqTkWh7a4Tb xW8zBdSzaJKT3JhE9PJ3CG/p3FnpQDhG14LGi531V0stVM3EzkHeBOVSwjMAnnMf6tSg nuLw0CL0uvDQNCf6GbB+NWcqYcr/T7TagMoLZWNNRASiww5dB1DJL7L6mrDcXTxVQEly fUOxzpO49K0NA2gGZGM+1XgaPjGmsSFvHK951XUYD2avCkyDEXZyUsuFUIarB2JYMuQv dilIOEcKSW2Hdg20EjFRy0QD01NlRypRo7OZ+d9wuxFGLrDMIzWXt2Yh5decVy+8N/ck xEfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HAFpQOdKOy/9tI7BZl8BBWQFvbNN6nRIvdu4Vpi41GY=; b=17Sm3x711RYDqrr6rug8UBV16GdrLAgRk1gKLMw6ZfERZac8ADBxCaopKmlBwjEZ7p Pqy/M8gq7lMAo0cVJtKRTAnyzWFmvgF6WCUG5LiwrLHkk+rg6P9TLXkEqKdESR28hLx7 7F6nP9qhhsTj9JuOBZ4gRhJw+iCgNs84QXSpzpY3DJbgmr17SeJ7uUgDa/5+oTG108YE 02SG5uLIP/3w5hWLlkYNET3H2vfApbD6ghAc3N9IJvV76T9imygiuW67CZaVg8PMNMox ycGlOYdUNfs8vqfNoT2j1g43x9v9KpH7yoSFfERhIYOJUAVuDKtgyK6kJT9WByrZuT/v NyWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53361iZqUpXvhyGQmRjHCjYacqxb/wCysBa5jkJY/vNQr7j/i3ij JSkfsexQyNYNgtvRnfporoqkGt/c6r8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVRVP8ondtVwwbeFcvrje0/7KLve2gQqGCtCuyAOwNYwtHyk4mexJwZUNjq3e+7myP1R5m+w== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f050:: with SMTP id s16mr727988pgj.258.1632432085003; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm6627447pfc.114.2021.09.23.14.21.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:21:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lf3nxb45.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215236 Archived-At: On 9/23/2021 1:58 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Jim Porter writes: > >> Ok, I've done this here, and all the other places as well. I also >> obsoleted the old `ansi-color-map' and friends instead of deleting >> them for the same reason. Hopefully all that's right; I tried to make >> sure that they warn the user if they use them, but that warnings don't >> show up when building Emacs. > > Thanks; looks good to me. There was a typo in the man.el part of the > patch, but I think I fixed it -- can you have a look and see whether I > did the correct thing? That looks correct to me. Thanks for the fix! (I switched back and forth between implementations there a few times, and I guess when I made the patch I was midway between changing it back.)