From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27397: [PATCH] New commands for bulk tracing of elisp functions Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:04:51 +0300 Message-ID: <948396af-2457-8e15-9523-ac1937c449c4@yandex.ru> References: <1348823a-7623-8146-8cc0-8c0eff13e458@orcon.net.nz> <34fcc090-6a8b-42de-b6c8-df182f8de938@yandex.ru> <8760fs5sjw.fsf@detlef> <871sqg5mig.fsf@detlef> <25ce7f3c-6f70-82f1-b3fb-7dd7362bbdf2@yandex.ru> <87r2ygi4yx.fsf@detlef> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497873983 13401 195.159.176.226 (19 Jun 2017 12:06:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:06:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/54.0 Cc: Phil Sainty , 27397@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 19 14:06:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvRh-0003Bg-Gs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:06:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvRm-0006nK-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59995) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvRX-0006kE-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvRS-0005Z6-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvRS-0005Yy-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvRS-0006tL-5c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27397 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 27397-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27397.149787390226405 (code B ref 27397); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27397) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2017 12:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvQU-0006rp-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:33618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMvQS-0006rJ-Gu for 27397@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m77so53969219lfe.0 for <27397@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RpZagNUra9dLMqmeGaT/0/jstsYFvbTmrY1mRp19IoM=; b=GJSqCBrc5ouswvmiIs2HDNNsD3x0pkn/XLuRRypvkc4PjkQk7RjmIW0P7jhXVolZ3+ 5S24QERRfyiaqp2ry7tUsU+QAGA52p8oIJYJBGE9huyzzxU/PzvUAdHEoz8Zn+hdbRyb yeEcQejxxjw6iUGfPtwr425TqTY0lwP9hhsiUVyFARnj7bn1k0Y7DQVYcoy5wGgwjEE2 WpSKCsphwpc3pFd2nerNFLMloHXFSxqHDj4S8iB9y9huaLcWRlUrhyxKD1ENP0EM1/Wy pXBsQEWRGscGoGLK2pVFqqp8NoONlv4pIJ9Dqo/exWv/uammBKTk39ETPEuXdfprbdtR pyFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RpZagNUra9dLMqmeGaT/0/jstsYFvbTmrY1mRp19IoM=; b=eTjxRaIgbDDAGKtlXUpYaYzVDBf6ovf1mKq4j94P1mhYwVofacuC9nb0UuUke1dNpO OvTbtNZjNKjHkO+kvBy5CBUchoDEOYLWDz1mUwW+R8n5WBQDSKgtlXAMb/B3cWxMBa9M tgz+YiFcAipFE/ut69i14uObyFOjzOmmITYYz/wDyOhsGoe2p6kfU3xETiL4plXAXmdd Me+kdVHUBwxvXy4Cp8KNJvqFoWleUwefFvdFWw33UrqjVCZCu6C+1e1k87wNqZpMDstn w2IWpABYYRO+ZT6l7HcH9YJsbJceOQETJ9RebOoLda6sWXCrt6SPay4xrzSk1GXmVxpf gJzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxn2lTdmyxWVbzLMMgQyrK279/0stOhrIRr+SdXL6WAEuIPVIJp BY8VRDj0WsmmhdqkOwE= X-Received: by 10.80.168.102 with SMTP id j93mr17265372edc.32.1497873894419; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 05:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k17sm5799394eda.24.2017.06.19.05.04.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 05:04:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r2ygi4yx.fsf@detlef> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133754 Archived-At: On 6/19/17 2:36 PM, Michael Albinus wrote: >> (with-eval-after-load 'tramp >> (trace-package "tramp-")) > > But this would also trace functions from tramp-sh.el, which I don't want. What would be the equivalent of your proposal, then? >> If we do what you suggest, it should be a new discussion, and it >> should improve elp-instrument-package as well. > > I don't believe it will be too hard to implement; why not doing it just > now? Because we risk stopping now for a while and having two inconsistent functions in Emacs. It also adds a burden to the contributor who might now have signed up for tackling this particular challenge. There will also be some nuances to work out, I'm sure.