From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27036: Acknowledgement (25.1; Blocking call to accept-process-output with quit inhibited!!) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:06:53 +0300 Message-ID: <93732aeb-867f-923e-3968-5bf4cc006ff5@yandex.ru> References: <36a49957-cade-c3b2-b6e1-f359aef9af5f@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506643924 13492 195.159.176.226 (29 Sep 2017 00:12:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:12:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 Cc: 27036@debbugs.gnu.org To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 29 02:12:01 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxiuK-0002pV-T4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 02:11:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxiuS-0008JB-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxitW-0007gs-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxitT-0007Hx-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxitS-0007Hb-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxitS-0007XH-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27036 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 27036-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27036.150664383228902 (code B ref 27036); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27036) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2017 00:10:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37290 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxisx-0007W6-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:44169) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxisw-0007Vm-SZ for 27036@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m127so3371319wmm.1 for <27036@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Yd01xWz/JYIKB6goHZMGai5yhxGFXhc6ySqcz43XP0=; b=vFlE/3HGLwzw8+6f/W9U+hmp5HkvbBAe057Qdd57Rr5j+I6GOfQZ3gGUZAcmwzqo7Z KXB+zLXXgj+w2AU5rFjZF5nymEqrqTtdaiYsG4W9+pntHvdlS+D0Uj2gsqM6bPXAAUW2 YilaSlQRewS492G6haKeDPeYASUEFiJgEnmzOynixyMPyajOZvOvnN3fNG/aajLTaQ9T MFlyWn5iahGIlyOXQcbzaAXzQ49ZquLoRh6U/ahBjoMqsJ+H716JGMFhA5tzlb8BlhE2 ADD5ny4T5BDj9mJKcogx6Y46N6DRHYR8xFP0WppcE6H0zdV4L6rLITspkBTGC+nOShne SJ8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Yd01xWz/JYIKB6goHZMGai5yhxGFXhc6ySqcz43XP0=; b=Vmn7zydPPzQJDeT2TXJkZhTaMSsiDkF6K4QBZ+ZyNv2u3P/y3f5sdih83t1p9UP5B+ zhSChRooT5wF8AXQYnJ998thCEtRaPtgIV4ovW9JRCR4vPKmmvEB47uwwI3yOlciVizd ZjgwvJZ8Wr3Kla9XHiBjYDJk2zw63KG5BYSnQ5wQWqULMP3ATZO1/oAjUIgvy7mKTZgQ RkwpphC1+oJG/azu9KIL0kamwT7l8BvBeKH7xmVZ1b1XX56ic9IoWyT3VuTzgxjV4M+g Eb40JfUMIDaMVt9e0KAfQHC8r+PzWuz+jAy+oF7Rp0NTyOWyEAmtcN7f4bJzYAtTvHuL sNug== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjkN24BKm2RpbiQ7pL84SjcTFOgzSPDGHYf2O0kpGLA7zwkpFCB VFCj9JoAukeADHyWuRpnbNyNgZ2H+KY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBHojGDjxiOzYrBnYixZqNfy5AH/3cx/ZXNmPQUy6z3qwN3NJ4O5bPUjdnF+JP76T5JvFgMZg== X-Received: by 10.80.137.83 with SMTP id f19mr7608256edf.77.1506643825096; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.97] (catv-80-98-57-21.catv.broadband.hu. [80.98.57.21]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w51sm2695505edd.60.2017.09.28.17.10.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:10:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <36a49957-cade-c3b2-b6e1-f359aef9af5f@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137553 Archived-At: If there's anybody else seeing this problem, could they please try out the patch and continue this discussion? The change makes sense to me, but I'd rather not push it without a user's confirmation. On 5/31/17 1:39 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 5/30/17 10:46 AM, Francesco Potortì wrote: > >> It does not seem to work, sorry.  I launch a long-running command in the >> inferior octave buffer, then in another window I go and edit the octave >> source.  After a while everything is frozen. > > Did you start with 'emacs -Q'? Or do you have e.g. company-mode enabled? > >> I did not restart emacs for testing, I just evaluated the patched >> octave.el.  Is that alright? > > Probably. > >> Does it makes sense at all to use the same process for interaction and >> for asking help?  Wouldn't it be simpler and more robust if a dedicated >> octave process was started for eldoc? > > No simpler, no. It's certainly easier to leave starting the process up > to the user. Especially when projects and user code are involved.