From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23513: package.el treats empty signatures as correct Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 23:19:37 +0300 Message-ID: <91f7ebef-3e86-2ab7-51ab-61377c5f4406@yandex.ru> References: <20160511093940.GA26912@empress> <1rvb2dx2y0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463430023 24408 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2016 20:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 20:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23513@debbugs.gnu.org, "L. Dixon" <_@lizzie.io> To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 16 22:20:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Ozq-0000ha-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47196 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Ozp-0001KD-Ft for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:20:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35459) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Ozm-0001Er-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Ozi-0007rs-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Ozh-0007rn-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Ozh-0003K3-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 20:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23513 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch security Original-Received: via spool by 23513-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23513.146342998712744 (code B ref 23513); Mon, 16 May 2016 20:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23513) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2016 20:19:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2OzS-0003JU-PQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:36193) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2OzS-0003JI-0c for 23513@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 16:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n129so115062460wmn.1 for <23513@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:19:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5wb5I+9gGXKLyowo99gZFV4NmQTMWLzYYGgapjb1vqA=; b=0pzsbyMZEwo4kWXB0A49Du5nbm7zQTw1wmE0f2rIG79Yunwf2ob5amDLsWl9u+E+FW gDSF4/mSlanY8vYwns+NB/IrSbFwCMqcHGQsDakcM0B4E2rW6kGuM59Ua+nKudxtScZb wgPz5vqNWAjp4J0yZHL/AXYJzZ0iOUQhoGG9hfiLRTOW3YrbnsadcIjP4TGckbpnzDU9 j+lm/7L5Nhu90Y4+eu2mBVPqEY6c57ihpehv/vQCWmxi5U5CvoU1WZeko+8QhHLaZNwU /Rt5Yof7LmdM5Cgf5YF6MIjCbvesBDLt9WiKDeTl/fnqJjsur3JRrhfKqPmyh2iOc0sM fp3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5wb5I+9gGXKLyowo99gZFV4NmQTMWLzYYGgapjb1vqA=; b=LQOGdOKmYs0PHK0mw3hUzYtUcXG+/8ZaF9buEc4Le0hvUVIg/2k9IxC8V4mmOL1Wj4 Jyjz2BwPoYgspR04dNQAhCg2fvzaV4cEnN2rmANAbBMznGbnNzByJNWzVpHYbxxUI4CZ yDRkRX9fb7EoRhQoTxvbiyr7EBAuk6pSU7TKir2WxTqRiw8cGhw+P72UXv60fn6URerB CTlKkGJACI7hQCfMOfpaWR/EXxnLUwGLQNjapDvtH0NLVkcqT5XheOt/cnd9kfaBcjOx X51GrZil6bLU9wFi3bUGD+rHiKYJ3jediWO7bPKjjSvPe6/iKWu36dHeqhhG9Lajrbfs AynQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU/CnyuwRaTKlDBdvy73tEpj8OP1I1ekHU0h4WVjTPSNh+YeZBBMA8Zssf1A6TIMA== X-Received: by 10.28.189.138 with SMTP id n132mr20102813wmf.34.1463429980573; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k1sm3365206wjx.22.2016.05.16.13.19.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 May 2016 13:19:39 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 In-Reply-To: <1rvb2dx2y0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118330 Archived-At: On 05/16/2016 09:39 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: >> That's definitely a cause for concern. Glenn, does Hydra lack the >> necessary libraries to support the package signature check? > > Hydra's "gnupg" package is from the 2.0 series, and only provides a > "gpg2" executable. epg-config--program-alist requires something from the > 2.1 series. So (epg-find-configuration 'OpenPGP) fails with "no usable > configuration". > > I have added "gnupg1" to the requirements for the coverage build in an > effort to get a "gpg" executable. We'll see if this helps. Thanks. Ideally, we'd have something like (skip-unless (or (getenv "HYDRA") (ignore-errors ...)), to make sure the tests like that are _not_ skipped on the CI. Individual contributors may not have gpg installed (although there's a case to be made that the package tests should just fail for them), but the CI is our last "line of defense", especially for important tests. > (It would be easier to see if this worked if the coverage job wasn't > currently failing, as it has been for two weeks, due to network-stream > changes that cause a test failure - bug#23508. This is a repeated pattern > that makes me think people don't actually pay much attention to the > coverage job.) I've noticed this failure when running tests locally, but it's far from my area of expertise. I think using a separate mailing list for the build status notifications might be a mistake. I'm not subscribed to it (not sure why; maybe I've missed the announcement), and apparently not many other people are. There's not a lot traffic there, why not just send it to emacs-devel?