From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53636: 29.0.50; face-remapping broken on master Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:58:31 +0100 Message-ID: <916b44c9-56dc-65b9-8894-cb5954e1bd9c@gmx.at> References: <87o83tib13.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtjd8485.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6fd9glm.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq19dk1.fsf@gnu.org> <87czk97yt6.fsf@gnus.org> <8335l49jwu.fsf@gnu.org> <835ypz8zbm.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsp2v0ky.fsf@gnus.org> <83leyu73i8.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0edrvxm.fsf@gnus.org> <83sft15egx.fsf@gnu.org> <871r0loxr9.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtj85tm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnibn48c.fsf@gnus.org> <8335kz4tgu.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee4hg7g6.fsf@gnus.org> <83y22p21na.fsf@gnu.org> <871r0haqzr.fsf@gnus.org> <8335kw1n9u.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtj34mdj.fsf@gnus.org> <837da6yb0j.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0e5vqjm.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5026"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 53636@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 11:11:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHNTU-0001Ab-76 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:11:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHNTS-000529-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:11:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHMLA-0007fB-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHML0-0007mZ-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHML0-0001Ku-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53636 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 53636-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53636.16443107205105 (code B ref 53636); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53636) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 08:58:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHMKd-0001KH-TK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:45487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHMKc-0001K4-BC for 53636@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:58:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1644310712; bh=6EmYbA9WaR6z42/7QzrDWHVxuEZw/LP34Oqgqpz9GBY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=fpdDLV9YEvQ1AE9emUOOm+/XPdAtByTcSwv+8c0Csn5Tr6NlKGWH47O3+K6IPoqA1 JH/GsKYor97awTVocdEG4xsJhhuDCq+LL5+IIHtrQDlQR4yJ6x+tYvN+DwLs027mkU GrelFrwVAtrx1I7mcXNeGGbeqoAXNfcJRoWwZoqo= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.151]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MxDkm-1oEx7o0NZ2-00xd6T; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 09:58:32 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87k0e5vqjm.fsf@gnus.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vJWzqLdKadOHde38/fTLDJVC4fAX5VBZsMojN2uygw8M0g1yCM0 eOQKknu7iTEWLNQREj38yy51fuLYXaL8nnnMVSX6LEHRSKu9J+sQiOdM7xCn2Xp1grrRW7i y0bT5wY/hP7r48cyBhIs9KLzwL0ubDXJOugoFyoqz8SdGm8bc+uwNjhmt5vupS1LcShqAoK wMrV7rL6YQOiVUrFZNUMg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qu4oJrJuYfw=:wW3QyW+3yYKLZkUbTzaFMI zHI3t7g5OGQ8oJ6nWxpMnHpSTrWov5tULmh9l1+t/u2CtaIhUuQ1HssaHqqluKmljQNkRvI/S FC3SKgmAuDYWeunfD+H7QcNnOUwU8Vtm3evjniNGWeExwJ1p7hwdWXGPVLJ3uXl6BXLCD+ynq 5ieO/PwaGUbWURuoWHezmJ4I112o45b5ta9IMXostUYX8UsoX0stIxuDStJWVSS1Qi4aXMjqq vxcByChaInnIZR1PDjpUNZpxNjGpl34WwqpsK2ibVWWZUTJbFlcMiszX5tmrfXIbk/pbZOhnB YTguHCYWXDxGdFsOMioDrMHKG/jNRN4m7YIcn0/aET5rps1eOuXN10mxh009GylvwNMwdrD2s kVjUEoCeHEBynU+j2QisSchx/UjoJwGR+rdMu8qpcJQGvV1Nhg5BbgjtMpz6vFqjTeZAXWC1i aEhXumUhJ3Tn+tHdPwhZCDH/TlkRldv9s7HpP3v3rbPBhtphdu6++FBpADAwmgjHPUWwtbBo1 HoinQJj6GUG+qFBn2oFsAm8/DwjB9h1vwhGMQhQVh7LM1Ue9YW4nUDlUss6o82vLD6WMUQyVg B5Bg784SgD9ZBDG4VoVsz2bd7TwQey6otSCqrwSfT7OhZSpyxJ+wLWd8fz0EegdKnzmsHOrSE K6hnQNSMnKxtFNuwpG/K0wMjrkqT1jS6tRGYl5L8GZxEL+9UcCCvLZ55usIQTY6m4eIlYlIPF PTUvHDwJKUfE5Zu2zcEvy55jEUkHPi6nHs64y6lWtcxjQlydd9VpRX47LVqOgC4Q6s0LltZi X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:226346 Archived-At: >> And what happens when you call make-frame from another buffer is not a >> bug? Is face-remapping-alist supposed to affect the buffer in which >> it is set on all frames or just on the single frame where >> face-remap-add-relative was called? > > I'm not sure. But the current behaviour (affecting all buffers on the > new frame) has to be a bug. Face remapping has never been properly synchronized with windows and frames. What's needed is a simple hierarchy window > window's buffer > window's frame where the first should be implemented with the help of a 'face-remapping' window parameter and the last with the help of a 'face-remapping' frame parameter. Just like we (should) do for things like the scroll bars or fringes. But we need a consensus on this first. martin