From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16382: Cut/Copy tool-bar icons issue Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:47:45 +0100 Message-ID: <91321D5C-3AC5-4E50-AB37-4ACDAF8C16CB@swipnet.se> References: <52CC0A04.4060707@alice.it> <70266380-7A58-495E-9DDE-A50CF2531391@swipnet.se> <52D27BED.8000909@alice.it> <52D2D8DE.8000902@swipnet.se> <52D4FD59.7040203@alice.it> <52D57326.6050305@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389721755 24601 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2014 17:49:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16382@debbugs.gnu.org To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 14 18:49:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3877-0002OB-19 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:49:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49817 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3876-0000EE-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W386v-0000A0-Ln for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W386o-0006Nb-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W386o-0006NU-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W386o-0007rs-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16382 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-emacs , Stefan Monnier Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138972169530164 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2014 17:48:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3863-0007qR-8E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3862-0007qG-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W385u-00069W-Ld for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W385u-00069S-IY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W385o-0007qa-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W385i-00066J-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:48:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailfe07.swip.net ([212.247.154.193]:54063 helo=swip.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W385h-00065w-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:47:53 -0500 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 468237470; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:47:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52D57326.6050305@alice.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83485 Archived-At: Hello. 14 jan 2014 kl. 18:25 skrev Angelo Graziosi : > Il 14/01/2014 17.07, Jan Dj=E4rv ha scritto: >> Hello. >>=20 >> 14 jan 2014 kl. 10:03 skrev Angelo Graziosi = : >>=20 >>> Should we open a new bug report for this? >>>=20 >>=20 >> This report is fine. The omission to copy to PRIMARY looks intended, = because when text is read-only and cut acts like copy, text is copied to = PRIMARY. >=20 > "intended" ? If it is intended, which is its usefulness? >=20 > If one wants to move text from a place to another, this doesn't work = using the mouse and the "cut" icon on the tool-bar... >=20 > 1. select the text with mouse-1 (dragging over the text) This should already put the text in PRIMARY. > 2. click the "cut" icon on the tool-bar: the text is removed > 3. now move the mouse pointer where you want the text to reappear > 4. click mouse-2 to paste: nothing happens >=20 > So, newly, which the usefulness of the above "intended" omission? >=20 >=20 >> I wonder if there is some thought behind this we don't see. >=20 > ah.. >=20 Does it work if you use C-w instead of cut? Jan D.