From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11785: 24.1; term-mode doesn't respect first color change from a process Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:07:17 -0400 Message-ID: <8ssja4aqqi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <5fpq8mplv9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5vd34lom0x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348729700 28512 80.91.229.3 (27 Sep 2012 07:08:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:08:20 +0000 (UTC) To: 11785-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 27 09:08:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8Cp-0000WH-GX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:08:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44126 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8Ck-0001cg-Bn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8Cc-0001VQ-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8CV-0003aw-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8CV-0003an-Ny for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8CY-0007OC-09 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:08:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 11785 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Mail-Followup-To: 11785@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 11785-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D11785.134872964528352 (code D ref 11785); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11785-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2012 07:07:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8Bw-0007ND-BB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:07:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:37136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8Bt-0007N6-GY for 11785-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH8Bp-0002Fl-FG; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 03:07:17 -0400 X-Spook: computer terrorism RSA Ft. Meade Rubin Mena Semtex X-Ran: 6bb1Qj%l{9fJkfB/,0W`I=6[2^6|5W (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:31:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64945 Archived-At: Version: 24.3 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Stefan, you have some comments in term.el saying that >> term-ansi-face-already-done should perhaps be t in more places. >> Maybe this example shows why it shouldn't be? > > I can't remember any of it and don't have time to look into it now, > so... I'll trust you on that, but in any case, it suggest complementing > my comment. I'm afraid I know nothing about what is going on here, I just saw by experiment that reverting that change fixed the reported issue. I committed it so it will hopefully get some testing that may reveal whether or not there are any other consequences.