From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20688: "make check" fails on Fedora 21 x86-64 Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 03:13:44 -0400 Message-ID: <8niobbrh3r.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <5567F0DF.3000401@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432883669 32465 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2015 07:14:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 07:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20688@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 29 09:14:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUm-0005IA-L2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:14:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUm-0000ok-21 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:14:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUW-0000UG-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUV-0008AW-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUV-0008AL-4w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUU-0001Ry-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 07:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20688 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20688-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20688.14328836285546 (code B ref 20688); Fri, 29 May 2015 07:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2015 07:13:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60027 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUF-0001RO-Qc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36727 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUD-0001RG-Rk for 20688@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyEUD-0000VU-0I; Fri, 29 May 2015 03:13:45 -0400 X-Spook: Al Jazeera FTS2000 Osama JSOFC3IP kilderkin ASPIC Elvis X-Ran: ~IyJZ"=mJ3K3,d!%gh6Z%%+<[#tmWk@X>jTE#y=ce~z\A+8i%+z2w,C.Uc{$h~qW>O18l? X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 29 May 2015 03:05:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103291 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > vc-test-rcs04-checkout-model has never passed, even when it was introduced. > If it was an attempt to motivate some VC progress, it hasn't worked. > IMO it should be marked as expected-failure. I just did that. Since there already is a bug report about file-notify-test03-autorevert, I don't see what's left to do here.