From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Cambell Barton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37257: failure of emacsclient ... --alternate-editor="emacs --eval" Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 03:52:30 +1000 Message-ID: <8f6d9ce5-c6c0-cae6-c546-096d2f0daa5d@gmail.com> References: <42d7bbd5-cde9-e4ca-07f2-486eaff18dbc@cs.ucla.edu> <87impv845y.fsf@gnus.org> <7de06494-7d7f-26b4-f7e7-b061d80241e5@cs.ucla.edu> <87ftky62hy.fsf@gnus.org> <87zhj5ycy6.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="95226"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 Cc: 37257@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 15 19:53:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9Yi1-000Og7-LC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:53:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9Yi0-0004q6-4N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9Yhr-0004pz-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9Yhq-0007zK-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9Yhq-0007z5-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9Yhq-00089E-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Cambell Barton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37257 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37257-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37257.156856996231282 (code B ref 37257); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37257) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2019 17:52:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9YhV-00088T-Pz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:52:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com ([209.85.215.181]:42400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9YhU-00088I-LT for 37257@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id z12so6570557pgp.9 for <37257@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:52:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CXbXEdqWNruhB2EbCtvrbJ0Kvd+YfyAGCSh1RcV3vJk=; b=BLyG/FqBRkBDPbWbx8VvWoRmMFflmMdkVhn8yK3bykxedyxpJm5JLL2Q/x8kAyErVe erM6PZ0O3Hith4IRPBIzPVRdvBDOPRdFr5sGun/x1A/a1eko1Ep6vW+EqVAQjd2vAaId /vO9vzbooKCDx36XdnQNEresPOfVfNtQcs7qDRcZeIUOZxX/R5GVFka+QOCjIwxJvvIn D0hRxyA4hmOZB1ZHqE72ooCg9keUBOIKkJeDIzFN320nlMlgQ9wJg0Rkrr9OyaEyr+xH dPjzdbdeK1I8HDjXvBzoDd+mgn1SN4iQJ7mm+2jCi4MA19SPzJANw+GD9FkypwCsg/lI gTNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CXbXEdqWNruhB2EbCtvrbJ0Kvd+YfyAGCSh1RcV3vJk=; b=F28wl/Gw/sMghv1WuE1wmXtvnUTcUEDyBnO5so0gPNS9dw7qyS/pZPpLoAnoTBUR8S j9lVMEYwiZ4hT2KUp0Tu35r67OH5qiIgszVaG1/kizp3IfPvIluLmcsxwHTBqvG7L1/8 IVvVHYfmTEqyUrWUdGLxDNn6gdaq98Hy7djIJ5XQkj7vDtbtuYNbQngYucJLFtF/dhtN F+fYKQhmoFc64z3gB9DgiPJAb0WBWzgSouTX5emq+Qwc4sSspb9Ry9L3MyAwoO05BAhr L0aFu3IjJQYkRex68741Nolp7nZIH5qlYOW2zvFg0kf03cMOt/L1sLGiWIM6XsL3L49F ti+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+8brRvFGQ6GTB5KT+BRHPJZXvaXX4jligL6gF8MvM5FkK2lu8 4T7exwp69tdcWt4CcI8PsW3zbrMCSUM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqypbiyy/8BhmfYIezgcAWZjeOxt/9lcJ4sfV8KARjcb718lQcZhBNhh88ZiCbODWERPNg/J5w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f83:: with SMTP id 3mr16560894pjz.90.1568569954388; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.1.1.180] (ppp118-209-104-247.bras1.mel11.internode.on.net. [118.209.104.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm9462142pgf.8.2019.09.15.10.52.32 for <37257@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:52:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zhj5ycy6.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166514 Archived-At: On 2019-09-15 22:13, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Cambell Barton writes: > >> I'm not sure what the best solution is here, it's just I had something >> that worked and now I can't get emacs27 to work usefully in the same >> way. > > Yes, we'll fix it so that the regression you're seeing goes away, but > we're just discussing whether it's possible to do so without reverting > the change that fixed another bug. > > I think it's unlikely that it's possible, so I've reverted the change, > which should make things work again for you. Can you check? > Checked 6d3cb263f941545c09acb7fb86b8336ad130aa8e, this is working now.