Thanks for the quick response! The changes sound good to me. On Mon, Apr 12, 2021, at 05:18, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Sheng. > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:57:01 -0500, Sheng Yang wrote: > > Any update/decision on this? The discussions have been inactive for more than 2 weeks. > > Sorry, I got distracted by another project which turned out to be bigger > than expected. > > I will decide this, basically to follow Drew's suggestion, since he is > the only one with strong views on the subject. What's more, I am now > convinced he is right. ;-) > > To sum up, the minibuffer will always be in `minibuffer-mode', regardless > of whether it is active or inactive. The minibuffer-mode key map will be > in force for INactive MBs, the map supplied by the commands will be in > force for active MBs. There will be compatibility aliases to > `minibuffer-inactive-mode', etc. > > I think this will enable you to solve the problems you have. > > It will likely take me a few more days actually to implement this. > > [ .... ] > > > Sheng Yang(杨圣), PhD > > Computer Science Department > > University of Maryland, College Park > > E-mail: styang@fastmail.com > > E-mail (old but still used): yangsheng6810@gmail.com > > -- > Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). > Sheng Yang(杨圣), PhD Computer Science Department University of Maryland, College Park E-mail: styang@fastmail.com E-mail (old but still used): yangsheng6810@gmail.com