From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45806: 26.3; `menu-bar-separator' Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:09:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8ba18d55-3484-4186-b8c2-0335cd8b7b7c@default> References: <<73e90890-b70a-4eb8-aa9e-d40959d1e1ec@default>> <<83pn2adwn1.fsf@gnu.org>> <4313a39b-5d20-4fff-ab14-fb9be0a43a78@default> <835z42dr4j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23627"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45806-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 19:41:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzObY-00061o-S1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:41:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35826 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzObX-00073E-MS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:41:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzO7H-0003nk-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzO7H-00070Q-0n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzO7G-0002hS-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45806 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45806-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45806.161047495910315 (code D ref 45806); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45806-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2021 18:09:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzO6Y-0002gJ-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:09:19 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:45174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzO6W-0002g5-Tl for 45806-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10CI98EN029532; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:09:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=aMkoMY1ZSas5UgimRBRWYAobVuLvrYHxMUlSptL4fpY=; b=bNcNEtRBLhyowChUPBtxjZACrcXbvmOTtZA0QWkq9FCb3PZHdC+RZN6xP1datZrf6s6d dtDb+Q+oFNVwwDptqaTVeUDW1dShYq+43l8NZgIcAAarr57JPQ+1Q3xRPtyf1YtvC0o2 k7bsL4bEN1cBJ9lqj91U6ySRX31FD20VpxLVO2n0C4t1thmBQAGq2eEMVcIXMa9x7K3r WYxDmvaTkMQg0TEwjP6eN3GHMg8RtqRmu/TcDsYCz62LPnWy1bq7ZyWlhpqr1RBRI5FY FNd/4P3Y/kd1yoY+DWB5CLMBw9zaOAK/fDFD72SAS8RIs2kySlPDzMlBN3EUQy/hssEn eQ== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 360kvjymds-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10CI6ZRW115788; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:09:10 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 360kehef2j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 10CI9936015506; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:09:09 GMT In-Reply-To: <835z42dr4j.fsf@gnu.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5095.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9862 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101120107 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9862 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101120107 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197827 Archived-At: > > > Sorry, this name is with us for too long to rename it now. > > > > Not a great reason not to rename and alias. IMHO. > Why am I not surprised that you don't accept the judgment of the > project maintainers? Why am I not surprised that you are personally hostile, and interpret an opinion as non-acceptance of a decision? Can we not politely agree to disagree about what should be done, without your going off again on your claims of insubordination?