From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61667: 29.0.60; Failure to redisplay Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: <8afe34f2-eeea-3be8-82ef-576a115beb6d@yandex.ru> References: <04d7cb31-684c-07c0-ee7b-503514fc1a85@yandex.ru> <87a617eanz.fsf@yahoo.com> <4306cb76-a44c-3101-e43c-fd64afae4a51@yandex.ru> <871qmje2ws.fsf@yahoo.com> <83edqjtbss.fsf@gnu.org> <4e5e2a46-9b07-206a-6774-9f98f34cbd14@yandex.ru> <83y1orrolh.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfeyswdw.fsf@gnu.org> <877cwactgv.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mt55sxli.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10620"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cc: Po Lu , 61667@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 01:52:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzqP-0002d0-9G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 01:52:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzq7-00034U-KM; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:52:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzq6-00034L-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzq6-0005nZ-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzq6-0004Sr-5T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61667 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61667-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61667.167711348517066 (code B ref 61667); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2023 00:51:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzpV-0004RC-IZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:51:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:34672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUzpS-0004Qx-NK for 61667@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:51:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id c12so9431275wrw.1 for <61667@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:51:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YaM4rB0KwL6Sfs1cx/1a6T4Jextyr4L2JQaJ9eUhPIE=; b=jJCQI5UTahapTyDuT1s+OXSTA1cInaBAF4NFAoPZc1uZejKUIWOj6dWaEhX/xAkGTM qWW76UV1/XoCwmCucCDkQzgdOP1Hs5hHCHZrDjwFacuoq1jiKEzC7KHVu3uUElmeDYNp 2ujFCI24QPLFqfFmhCLAAivbh7D2eOAmS1sDK8pWr80nUmez+Ddp1zntNePuh2Mlk6bC zIASjJmYusL13EwdX6/6XyrnT6ThapJrvNeC6nevhSrqHiI9LfAV8YCNf+TVosw4fy51 K5+EIDX+vTqfAX31vc8+ByQYXJV4bS5RV7Plz1oQPi/ZCBGCFaFqMkfp/ykP2I5tlRDq DUlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YaM4rB0KwL6Sfs1cx/1a6T4Jextyr4L2JQaJ9eUhPIE=; b=Nm3MK4Q3PurUvmmeqZGCpifaSfriF2Q5cYsfu1s4Sq7Ud11Nqy3N7Q1aENTLpMa7jN DObehnKJeaAyKrS3/HTdFB01SbhMhGWuixGGDFVuBtne6n4V7tuQsK8hoYl/K+4EVbEV 1AABqsuUu5Nla/WJljoErwjoXtqvNvDIWvnB8XWINjg42juy7tdLJYE2ZFFOU35csM7q +1qZXMS/AoWxOUIHxGgE/AudtVfqcLQ0OtSgd/U3Nx26ZXXKEO0zO37QEjKZRRhhl26c Wr0WP8mB1474/2kg3KyGhEdBJWmbPWPowNhnI3q3iMCBA2atxqyrHwQRWtnNDDlravnU P1qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU0winDzt6O9zovBzzx69PwS1cPZpNDTns7SpNOWyDJj26MMZdj PXxwqR1plIU1A3vZTVxDih4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/sOOVJ6RN2esPpt8fhWIHk+dLHZc8PsCtoRSc3wR4ROomBz69X7O0CTuXmQCpGzCfNC+3Zqw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:62c7:0:b0:2c5:55cf:b1ab with SMTP id o7-20020a5d62c7000000b002c555cfb1abmr7827439wrv.48.1677113476592; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:51:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z16-20020a1c4c10000000b003e2096da239sm9051356wmf.7.2023.02.22.16.51.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:51:16 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256411 Archived-At: On 22/02/2023 18:29, Gregory Heytings wrote: > >> >> Indeed, I haven't managed to reproduce the problem even once when the >> printing patch is applied. >> > > You said the bug appeared a month ago or so, maybe you could try to bisect? Excellent question. I have now reproduced this going as far back as Emacs 28.2. So I'm not sure where to look now -- I guess it could have been due to a system upgrade, but I don't see anything specific in the apt upgrades history. Upgrades did occur, though. Sorry to have implied it was a regression against 28, anyway.