From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60505: 29.0.60; Fido Mode and Tramp Completion Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:37:31 +0000 Message-ID: <8aadf0ddd54d67a3213d@heytings.org> References: <87k024918k.fsf@jroy.ca> <8dea9f3e0e411c315b04@heytings.org> <87tu15m6g7.fsf@gmx.de> <8dea9f3e0eb47ac9e4ab@heytings.org> <371ba1d0be1f14c7c798@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24270"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60505@debbugs.gnu.org, Julien Roy To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 22:38:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoE9-00065Y-P8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 22:38:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoE4-0000vk-Fr; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoE2-0000vb-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoDy-0004eK-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoDy-00020d-4F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60505 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60505-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60505.16737322547688 (code B ref 60505); Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2023 21:37:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55663 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoDW-0001zv-E4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:37:34 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:44628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pGoDU-0001zo-MO for 60505@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:37:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1673732252; bh=h4bLY+5Awxwf3AMVXuvqgAmXwStBqP6v0331Qcv/scE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=8kC5oAorNfls/+j03ufi9iYFuFx6UgVAolDuVjB5ZFKqvV69SYszH8Vy6KYhEo+a1 N53Qnxxo4GggHPjO9qTmrNE0Ud2eD9uffSzmXbHdQ6sgy70jHHTb7dIg4aaMwcxZ9d TIwlHWpl1drjUy2Z+Jl2E3wY8vzn+KwzmrKHoTrhaQ3I6+6PpgXUsXCIOTp/EtymkC ypPog6UcX1ExaDT6PMmDiZH4NdB2v4UK0lxfvvnKuF/qfTHwHLFz1YCvE5qzHgqpyF tAUrHHUu7ZWQPZeyXkUvhNQ8tk37kIXJIQ0CFDSZE4JD17+qGnrqCgO4oKHBeJEFJ5 nLMD+BFtdxBKw== In-Reply-To: <371ba1d0be1f14c7c798@heytings.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253388 Archived-At: Michael, what do you think of that patch? It would be regrettable to leave that bug unfixed in Emacs 29. > > By the way, to limit the scope of the potential collateral damages, it > is also possible to use that condition only when completion-styles > contain 'substring' or 'flex'. > > What do you think of the attached patch? >