From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>,
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>, 44674@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#44674: 28.0.50; Adding current-cpu-time for performance tests
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:40:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8EE5DC1E-5585-4585-B6E9-58717149ADA6@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C161C9BA-8FCE-4845-A67E-6A6A1871CB3D@acm.org>
On November 16, 2020 12:11:34 PM GMT+02:00, "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org> wrote:
> > +The return value is a pair (CPU-TICKS . TICKS-PER-SEC).
>
> Perhaps not ideal to cons in a timing primitive where low overhead is
> called for.
> What about just returning an integer and have a different way to get
> at TICKS-PER-SEC?
> After all, the timer frequency is not specific to each measurement.
>
> Ideally the returned value should be a fixnum to minimise overhead,
> but it may restrict the range on 32-bit platforms.
>
> I also agree with Phillipp's comment about clock_gettime.
AFAUI, CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID accounts for all the threads, so might not be what we want even if it is supported, since other threads might be involved which we aren't interested in (e.g., GTK threads).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-16 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-16 1:07 bug#44674: 28.0.50; Adding current-cpu-time for performance tests Stefan Monnier
2020-11-16 7:13 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-11-16 7:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 11:46 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-11-16 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 18:31 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-11-16 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 22:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-11-16 10:11 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-16 10:40 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2020-11-16 10:48 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-11-16 10:53 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-16 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 15:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-11-16 16:14 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-11-16 17:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 17:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 17:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-11-16 18:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 18:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-11-16 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 18:32 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-11-16 19:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 20:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-11-16 18:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-11-16 18:39 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-11-16 19:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-11-16 17:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-11-16 19:15 ` Mattias Engdegård
2022-04-26 13:55 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-04-26 15:13 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-04-27 13:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-04-27 17:14 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-04-27 17:20 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8EE5DC1E-5585-4585-B6E9-58717149ADA6@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=44674@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mattiase@acm.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).