From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10148: 24.0.91; "pending" regexp Isearch Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:47:18 -0800 Message-ID: <8DC0B561F4F94ADF917DC2CB29B32D92@us.oracle.com> References: <87ipm3yd6n.fsf@mail.jurta.org><87aa7ehr9n.fsf@mail.jurta.org><87fwh5gajc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322664500 11158 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2011 14:48:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:48:20 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Stefan Monnier'" , <10148@debbugs.gnu.org> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 15:48:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlSK-0003wp-8G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:48:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlSJ-0003zA-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlSC-0003z5-CZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlS2-00041P-VM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlS2-00041K-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlS5-000148-GW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:48:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10148 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10148-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10148.13226644594064 (code B ref 10148); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10148) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2011 14:47:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlRj-00013U-39 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVlRf-00013M-Rp for 10148@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pAUElT0a024959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:47:30 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAUElSvq026981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:47:29 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pAUElNjP031096; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:47:23 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.44.224) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:47:23 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acyvaaax6MpRZ9kNSwqp+sATkAVaWwABHMDw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090201.4ED64203.0017,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:48:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54480 Archived-At: > Another option is to not say anything at all. I don't have a strong > opinion on this, but I never found "pending" useful and I don't think > I'd have felt differently if it had said "adjusted" instead. +1 Or use some text that says what it means? You say it moves to another search hit ("adjusts its position to another match"). Is that other search hit always the next/previous one (depending on direction)? Or is it at least some simple, consistent movement that is easy to name? If so, maybe just say that you are moving to the "[next]" match or some such. Dunno - it's not clear to me what is involved. But it's also not clear to me from either "pending" or "adjusted". And if you say nothing at all but move to another search hit, that too might be confusing. HTH.