From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12067: 24.1; improper menu formatting with multiple \t chars Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:06:11 -0700 Message-ID: <8A9A3FFCBD5F433094079C3662EB3314@us.oracle.com> References: <87pq7hz24r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343401637 865 80.91.229.3 (27 Jul 2012 15:07:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12067@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Jason Rumney'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 27 17:07:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sum8H-0007eE-3x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:07:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52396 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sum8G-0001Sf-8Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sum8A-0001Ix-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sum89-0000PW-BQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sum89-0000PL-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SumEr-0001Q1-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12067.13434019995398 (code B ref 12067); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2012 15:13:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SumEA-0001P1-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:28552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SumE8-0001Ot-Pr for 12067@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:13:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q6RF6GL6022914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:06:17 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6RF6FVE020533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:06:16 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt101.oracle.com (abhmt101.oracle.com [141.146.116.53]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q6RF6FpL032140; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.222.163) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:06:15 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac1sCBAkKNxsz0vDR/OVTDSsMJVEQAAAQGNw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 In-Reply-To: <87pq7hz24r.fsf@gnu.org> X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62460 Archived-At: > > It turns out that using only a single \t does the right > > thing in terms of alignment in this case. But shouldn't > > multiple \t's let you tab (indent) further, as they do > > in text buffers, doc strings, etc.? And > > presumably \t\t should not draw a rectangle, in any case. > > No. A menu is not a buffer. No one said it is.