Sorry for waiting. There is output: ((sort-by "-*-bold-normal-normal-*-13-*" "harfbuzz:-outline-Courier New-bold-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1") (list "-outline-Courier New-*-mono-*-iso8859-1" ["-outline-Courier New-bold-italic-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-bold-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-normal-italic-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-bold-italic-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-bold-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-normal-italic-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1" "-outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-iso8859-1"]) (default\ fontset:\ font\ for 1092 nil) (open "-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "harfbuzz:-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-13-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0") (sort-by "-*-normal-normal-normal-*-13-*" "harfbuzz:-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0") (list "-outline-*-mono-*-gb2312.1980-0" ["-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-GungsuhChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-GulimChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-DotumChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MingLiU-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-NSimSun-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-FangSong-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-SimHei-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-KaiTi-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" ...]) (w32font-list "-outline-*-mono-*-gb2312.1980-0" ("-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-GungsuhChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-GulimChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-DotumChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MingLiU-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-NSimSun-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-FangSong-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-SimHei-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-KaiTi-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0")) (harfbuzz-list "-outline-*-mono-*-gb2312.1980-0" ("-outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-GungsuhChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-GulimChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-DotumChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MingLiU-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-NSimSun-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-FangSong-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-SimHei-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0" "-outline-KaiTi-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0")) (list "-*-Courier New-*-gb2312.1980-0" nil) (w32font-list "-*-Courier New-*-gb2312.1980-0" nil) (harfbuzz-list "-*-Courier New-*-gb2312.1980-0" nil) (list "-*-Courier New-*-mono-*-gb2312.1980-0" nil) ...) On January 26, 2020 8:10:15 PM GMT+03:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: jumper 047 >> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:06:11 +0300 >> >> To reporduce launch 'emacs -Q', then type C-x 8 RET 444 RET inside >> *scratch* buffer. >> Expected character 'ф' displayed with font Courier New, but got >> character displayed with BatangChe > >Thanks. This is very strange, since the Courier New font, which is >used for the default face in "emacs -Q" on Windows, does have that >character. I tried on 2 different Windows systems, and on both Emacs >used Courier New. > >Does anyone else see this? > >Could you please do the following and post the results? > > emacs -Q > M-: (setq font-log nil) RET > C-x 8 RET 444 RET > RET > font-log C-j > >The "font-log" part in the last line should be on a separate line in >the *scratch* buffer (that's what RET before it is meant to arrange), >and C-j (i.e. Ctrl-j) should be pressed with the cursor after the 'g' >character that ends "font-log". > >The result of C-j will be a long list, with some "..." in it. Please >go to each such "..." and press RET on it, to have the list fully >expanded. Then post here that list. > >Thanks. -- Простите за краткость, создано в K-9 Mail.