From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25581: 25.1; Incorrect statement in (elisp) `Hooks' Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <88261d86-ec91-474a-bcf4-a0be9d80375b@default> References: <8e81acfe-ecaa-4fac-9484-24541b232ba1@default> <87k0xo83ww.fsf@gnus.org> <9a1b7301-09fd-4df0-be17-e20b4ebbe36e@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8986"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 25581@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 26 20:29:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kB0AZ-0002EC-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:29:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kB0AY-0000Kw-Ex for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kB0AQ-0000JT-Ey for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kB0AQ-0007eE-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kB0AQ-00089Z-1E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25581 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 25581-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25581.159846648431241 (code B ref 25581); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25581) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2020 18:28:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kB09U-00087p-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:56698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kB09S-00087J-E8 for 25581@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07QIFHvE161115; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:27:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=/IpdcyVCJBPp8Es6gwxqL10a9fPWoKTsBJSyxxFjPUI=; b=OBB40pX2P/E1/a9B/jxEux+qaWPy2jVSpwis7bzec9h3GYOjcp+RuyMY8SlZidCg38JZ 9kGPFTjboVYmLfwqf2a5wzoSjSEGUGuwPGR0uA8nSPpz74sy4WQQmZ+2TMUqt89U2bih 7yBFhRS1B50Wd+TrfYA7fvgSsNU/MXjhiSTeT1IjpyhJsJZMN9ykwleaf4ZtOAHQrxTE 2XRND7urfYWt/letso9e8OwdbrZP6+8o1VfGnchaV4s8tvwWZV9dNJHqFDm0mZn2eyvq AtymYdtHXvD7L2FPtm6cMko2Vd4Ap7FfMGWD4ZnuJHeW4Dk96ujf71OPbdLcruOPVl/1 8w== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 333w6u0p28-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:27:56 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07QIGGWG133464; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:27:55 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 333ruawvs6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:27:55 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 07QIRsx0019861; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:27:54 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5044.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9725 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=858 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=1 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008260136 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9725 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=853 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008260136 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186460 Archived-At: > > Some vars are _intended_ to > > have a value that can be a single function or a list of > > functions. Some of the latter kind of variables are > > hooks. (Maybe _all_ of the latter can be treated as > > hooks; maybe not.) >=20 > We could conceivably start a long, slow process of giving them > new names, and converting them into enitrely regular normal hooks. Yes. And then (or even before then), we should update the doc to say that in the past _______ was allowed. This, to point out that there can be code out there in the wild that still expects that.