From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7724: wrap-prefix face is polluted Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:51:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87zkqr760c.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295812541 23049 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2011 19:55:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7724@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 23 20:55:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph62B-0001AB-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:55:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38439 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ph629-0006n0-TQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50124 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ph61w-0006i0-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph61W-0005NX-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:54:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph61W-0005NS-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph5r0-0003qt-IP; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7724 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7724-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7724.129581183514787 (code B ref 7724); Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2011 19:43:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph5qs-0003qS-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:43:55 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph5qq-0003qH-Tx for 7724@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (162.254.218.209.transedge.com [209.218.254.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0NJpnMu009919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:51:50 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6BD0B16075F; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:51:47 -0500 (EST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:44:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43568 Archived-At: > I am using a wrap prefix with just spaces. This works nicely, but > unfortunately the face used for first char after the prefix pollutes > the display of the wrap prefix, see the attached file. What face, in your opinion, should instead be used? Think about it. > I see some problems with the cursor display when on the first > character to. I enter that char from above the cursor is displayed. If > I enter it from below (with the arrow key) the cursor is not > displayed. I can't reproduce this. Please provide a recipe.