From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9982: Theme faces wrongly applied after background changes. Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:41:51 +0800 Message-ID: <87zkd46z74.fsf@gnu.org> References: <097h3b7rlx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877h0a6a0s.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkd6bpun.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327999382 25985 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2012 08:43:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Brendan Miller , 9982@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 09:43:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Ip-0001BE-Q6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:42:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Ip-0002tX-DY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:42:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Ij-0002tC-Ji for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Ie-0004Ez-48 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Ie-0004Ev-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:42:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Is-0008NN-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9982 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9982-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9982.132799933832145 (code B ref 9982); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9982) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 08:42:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9I9-0008MP-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:42:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:43957 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9I6-0008MH-Mu for 9982@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:42:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [155.69.17.139] (port=38456 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs9Hr-00075a-0h; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:41:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("Jan \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Dj\=C3\=A4rv\=22's\?\= message of "Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:02:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56300 Archived-At: Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: > Then does menu-set-font (the command for the menu choice "Set Default > Font") have the same problem? The code was taken from there. Yes, thanks for pointing this out. I've committed a fix for this too.