From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18399: 24.4.50; nadvice :filter-args -vs- interactive Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:42:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87zjegh1wj.fsf@web.de> References: <87mwagbhim.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409777008 24759 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2014 20:43:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18399@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 22:43:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHOg-0000i2-J6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:43:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47632 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHOg-0007aF-8s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHOX-0007ZH-7a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHOQ-0000v8-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHOQ-0000v4-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHOQ-0005Q3-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18399 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18399-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18399.140977694020779 (code B ref 18399); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18399) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2014 20:42:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58153 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHNj-0005P4-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:61789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPHNf-0005Oo-Uh for 18399@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.52.95]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LpOKb-1Y1cLE0ue5-00fFFc; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:42:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mwagbhim.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:01:21 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ygo/OhHnXaRbwRqGirY7TQrDFllzaPU32RnsGbHGHnq2t8yTqGu nwJMSkE6b2nvhEeFIGUg+qQlLOLyW+wnrEmecKJi26PZnHaw4rZ3A9gtv+xa2REczGRlJsG LGAI4jZgBIHuwko+xV7PSzD17avaCjw8tSIAGBFnk6J6PUn1wIBQUC9oTM9AUBaP5sqY53G tJ03nXyiw7tUR+p9VJBAQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93006 Archived-At: Tom Tromey writes: > So I think there must be a bug with how nadvice handles interactive > specs, either generally or with :filter-args. According to the doc (of `add-function'), an filter-args advice function has to accept exactly one argument (which is bound to the list of given arguments). So I think what you see is expected. I have stumbled over that behavior several times myself. Michael.