From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 04:14:23 +1100 Message-ID: <87zj8rezdc.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87386ji3e1.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83wq3vccxc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423243165 3323 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2015 17:19:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19791@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 06 18:19:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmYq-00039f-6q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:19:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmYp-0004J7-Kh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:19:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmWe-0000RZ-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:17:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmWb-0006q1-Uj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmWb-0006px-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:17:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmWb-0004sD-Nl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19791 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19791-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19791.142324296618663 (code B ref 19791); Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2015 17:16:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmVi-0004qw-8F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.syd.comcen.com.au ([203.23.236.77]:4087) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmVf-0004qW-LM for 19791@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from building.gnus.org ([27.96.197.126]) by smtp.syd.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t16HESCW069608; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:14:29 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83wq3vccxc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 06 Feb 2015 16:49:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.124, required 4, AWL 0.02, BAYES_50 0.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99107 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Do you mean that shr.el will change the colors it produces depending > on the background color? Because I don't seem to see this, maybe I'm > doing something wrong. Yes, it's supposed to. I'm running with a black background here, and shr lightened the colour of the text to a grey one that was readable. If the background had been white, I think it would have left the text completely black. At least that's how it's supposed to work. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/