From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21505: 24.4; Buffer order Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:53:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87zj0lo52a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337yd7hgn.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnppmk0.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4g55yat.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442476464 32282 80.91.229.3 (17 Sep 2015 07:54:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21505@debbugs.gnu.org, travis.hoppe@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 17 09:54:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU1B-0005Gy-IO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:54:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU1A-0001Uw-Nq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU18-0001Ud-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU14-0005bb-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU14-0005bW-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU13-00046L-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tassilo Horn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21505 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21505-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21505.144247638715702 (code B ref 21505); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2015 07:53:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35729 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU0B-00045C-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:53:07 -0400 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:60145) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcU08-000452-Tc for 21505@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (dhcp219.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.71.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E26E21A837E; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:53:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83y4g55yat.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:56:26 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106684 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Tassilo Horn >> Cc: hoppe , 21505@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:49:51 +0200 >> >> And to me, the order a, b, c seems to be the only right one. > > You do realize that the command line said just "*", and the order of > the files Emacs saw was determined by the expansion of that wildcard > by the shell, yes? Yes, I've seen that and I assumed that the usual shell expansion is alphabetical. > Or are you saying that the order of the buffers should always be > alphabetical? No, it should always be as given to emacs/emacsclient, i.e., when I invoke $ emacsclient x a b I want to have the buffer x selected and using `next-buffer' I'd switch to a and then b, and then to the other buffers which have existed before. Right now, x will be selected, but a and b are far away. Bye, Tassilo