From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:58:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87zi6gjaed.fsf@gmail.com> References: <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> <59DCCA92.8090501@gmx.at> <87tvz7m319.fsf@gmail.com> <5A341195.20008@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513612740 21683 195.159.176.226 (18 Dec 2017 15:59:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:59:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ola Nilsson , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 18 16:58:56 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxoc-0005FE-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:58:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51059 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxqZ-0004pQ-FW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:00:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxoo-0003NY-If for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:59:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxok-00038m-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxok-00038Y-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxok-0002rV-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.151361270910961 (code B ref 28605); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2017 15:58:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40739 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxoC-0002qj-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:58:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:37122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQxoB-0002qW-5e for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f140so30177103wmd.2 for <28605@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:58:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=TRPJAXQVX/CVlooSbrGo0+MIp45zdjGxsYODfrq0Qmw=; b=q7/fTENcbF7WuG5pmeBs1j28a6daZ28bul64McnazqxrXcEatNiocB5f36schRN7+x hnXka4O7cgJDHWSq0/7b5H1H/w0or+hFT0QaRSZ+OvbmIi8FoN/WDCjtqBu9wISLW3eB /G1xAkBbQfRTNC0qmNqmXcK29Wd+XyL/rUNLeyJ3ltjyaK3w3lw45jFiaXzNz8r4S/Al jI+3Azboi9cxkzUFMBGFqGwg5AhMW1k6mSWlxG+1yTRrHKVbHYbBrhSBmj5/BIcAwn/p oMFpmT+kj4WiAbl/4gC3ky2ljTUX7mVrOf98O4Krjiuo4hSoAXzKmyFP+659F3EkSBCd Rh/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=TRPJAXQVX/CVlooSbrGo0+MIp45zdjGxsYODfrq0Qmw=; b=BW1F2Hq0yxHbAfR78Z8A3g79TOCsjGpWtkWHvHZv5HpB/1GO7+xcESZoFpWSjUohab Hw8I3NXaXNhnmmZ/rRSBtXTFC24436qAal60tNP0DwaROFrQ3RvfLQKyvf3DgNhLm2g1 JNlw/dvx5eDo9BXh/DUpDO1lcb87Wunq4/PITYpIBr/jUk4VORYAu6XRoEIQWJCZUap3 fy6e1cf6S5ITGycOIbGsrzPt8H4BK0ySAhAOQKfhJkzM/vwq4uXD2Ua1cS6fqGegmaes vS05pg1sK6ebbaWV+KT+xAe11mdPl8LStEOhSWh7q87LjNM73ZPEZ0i0CN11l4uFhZqr pdlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIJPJwetYMv5qk0JsBZ42TyFWbBCVTObAgXChLaIg2T9X1zxG7y T0OB3C271DEbYYDM+hY35WU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoudaOk1pr1fblRChhVSLSESvsaebLt1QMm9r/VqXiyaJi0e62XTVjyNfKhzuzc/1AHJOdN7CQ== X-Received: by 10.28.145.18 with SMTP id t18mr140496wmd.32.1513612700795; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:58:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:9d1d:243:d7da:c232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z56sm10713587edb.72.2017.12.18.07.58.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:58:19 -0800 (PST) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <5A341195.20008@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2017 19:16:53 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141218 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Good. Git patch below. > > Robert, IIUC your paperwork is complete but we never applied that patch. > How shall we proceed? I'm perfectly happy to have it applied by someone with commit rights (my paperwork is complete). As a bugfix I think it should go on the release branch, but that's not my decision to make. Regards RObert