From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34920: 27.0.50; Poor eww rendering of SourceHut file "trees" Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:09:31 +0000 Message-ID: <87zhpojgs4.fsf@tcd.ie> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="239545"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , 34920@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 21 18:12:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h71Eo-00109t-Iw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:12:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42406 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h71En-0003cP-Gd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h71EW-0003UR-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h71Cc-0007la-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h71Cc-0007l8-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h71Cb-0001cm-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34920 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34920-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34920.15531881896222 (code B ref 34920); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2019 17:09:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h71CM-0001cE-0e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:09:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:33967) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h71CF-0001bu-O9 for 34920@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a16so5644572edn.1 for <34920@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:09:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=QYhFscpLyZRURCDEpz/SGtfz8Qa+B5/dmteGA8GvbWk=; b=ADW4LNZt3LEItEB4HPU65IC6TmrBNF8cym6c/GL4vr61CKK9ISHG8jgRXjtysQMhj4 ysxTCnxlwIXmRQP83VUa81F/W8bNFN0LTL17kkxrqOTgaP8sUe6uSJgJ221Wk/UvxrW2 oYQqNXOOCELZBHvVyF+4G4z5OZNhpiKo+DCf2DFo9AoR/aceSXaqfFux+a0f6h2huli7 RJbw5EsWPzzUZWQG5LXzjphlm+xLHtFZdFmvbYOckCq7jWcSPn3oczCn7JOggUz+yb51 rmWQZ0AJffo3LTnFHZ2U4K1th3PVWJJtAeeGkupAtH6RQpNUrDW0m/MwOXeYRmRrWzz0 plkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=QYhFscpLyZRURCDEpz/SGtfz8Qa+B5/dmteGA8GvbWk=; b=nOW30F0dKO+0o0Am9W6AhOAGjSJU0Xy1e8GjwiGE/ca0GccN+FWbKhOgIdhYYHVhwU caCYOjYdedXqyQU/Y0HbUVyxJqH47Gbf4O1vSD72h2amQ9+UNwtBCBT0E6jtsxJvVpfy CinylgWfV6Voh6yEz0UdJ/lzaRC/v2kEWHkpsCrMbFHBk9f3aaLJnvDE2YT1JX/CCKBU htrsp4iLFs9woRslqTlueF2Di1lJSUY8udKIuyjAaxZrr1nj+solPe6ePCt8VY/wqTDc YkhYY/5tuo3jNTp+75AxM1RNOorqWRO0J3x3ayax7OtuJBIIT7z7rPdvau9PCdSL+NcK Ro3A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWklcC1VavjocbkyvZGN2rpQ3SbTpNpkYmKRjG1dTCL13a+BaGz TWz5p1CH9KYOk/D0eGURwCRu4g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKJS2od5Ql4J+gJOg7KD1KSlavLTA0gD1vTFn4Sg2f21XSY7O1e3IsuCSaZrIC4BRAs6r9nw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9271:: with SMTP id j46mr3227662eda.184.1553188174030; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:09:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([134.226.214.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm1772897edj.61.2019.03.21.10.09.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:09:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:48:53 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156572 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >> Not sure I understand why you think so: is it because of (1) the time wasted >> fetching it or (2) the slowdown imposed by parsing it or (3) the slowdown >> imposed on the rendering when the CSS is large or (4) ...? >> >> My impression is that just (1) would rarely be a performance >> problem (assuming it's just one CSS file) > > It's seldom just one CSS file, and CSS files these days are often big > auto-generated monstrosities... > >> and that the parsing could ditch all the irrelevant properties we >> don't support anyway so the impact of (3) should be minor. So is it >> (2)? > > (3) is minor, while (2) could be an issue. > > But my point is that since we support very little CSS, spending time > fetching something that in 99% of the cases will make no difference to > our rendering is a disservice to the users. eww is slow enough as it > is. Would an opt-in user option not suit, assuming an initial PoC succeeds? -- Basil