From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37257: failure of emacsclient ... --alternate-editor="emacs --eval" Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:13:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhj5ycy6.fsf@gnus.org> References: <42d7bbd5-cde9-e4ca-07f2-486eaff18dbc@cs.ucla.edu> <87impv845y.fsf@gnus.org> <7de06494-7d7f-26b4-f7e7-b061d80241e5@cs.ucla.edu> <87ftky62hy.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="73961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37257@debbugs.gnu.org To: Cambell Barton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 15 14:14:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TQ4-000J5w-F2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:14:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TQ3-0003ZU-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPn-0003ZC-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPm-0006ua-2n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPl-0006to-QS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:14:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPl-0007Tu-Kp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 12:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37257 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37257-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37257.156854962228725 (code B ref 37257); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 12:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37257) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2019 12:13:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPS-0007TE-Kh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:60302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPR-0007T6-7y for 37257@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9TPO-00082s-1I; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:13:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Cambell Barton's message of "Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:45:46 +1000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166487 Archived-At: Cambell Barton writes: > I'm not sure what the best solution is here, it's just I had something > that worked and now I can't get emacs27 to work usefully in the same > way. Yes, we'll fix it so that the regression you're seeing goes away, but we're just discussing whether it's possible to do so without reverting the change that fixed another bug. I think it's unlikely that it's possible, so I've reverted the change, which should make things work again for you. Can you check? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no