From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23468: Feature request: highlight Edebug breakpoints Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:08:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhhvei0h.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87tv83hgqi.fsf@gnus.org> <83lftf65dn.fsf@gnu.org> <8736fnhdqs.fsf@gnus.org> <83eez763kl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="133612"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 23468@debbugs.gnu.org, pogonyshev@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 20 14:09:28 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA1Y-000YcL-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:09:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32882 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA1X-0003t1-7c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA19-0003cV-AG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA18-0001iF-4J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA17-0001i1-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA17-0000Sj-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23468 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 23468-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23468.15715733321760 (code B ref 23468); Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23468) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 12:08:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA0y-0000SJ-Ib for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:46710) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA0w-0000SB-OY for 23468@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:08:51 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMA0s-0006zZ-FL; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:08:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83eez763kl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:47:54 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169801 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > And now that I see it in action, I think its visual appearance could > be improved. What I see is the opening parenthesis of the form > highlighted in the 'highlight' face. I think we should use a distinct > face, so that it doesn't "disappear" if the user has hl-line mode > enabled and so that users could customize it independently, and also I > think an indication similar to GUD (on the fringe etc.) would be > better: more prominent and much more self-explanatory. OK, I've now added a new face, but defaulted to the highlight face, because that seems to stand out to me. As for a fringe indication -- there may be a bunch of breakpoints. Do we want to have something in the fringe for all of them? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no