From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42865: 28.0.50; Add new 'copy-region-quietly' defcustom Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:22:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87zh5uy9jr.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> References: <87lfihi0w5.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87mu2sm5vu.fsf@gnus.org> <87mu2q7g0b.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87ft8izilm.fsf@gnus.org> <878sdhr51e.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87mu1wzfsx.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4397"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42865@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 12 23:25:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHD1U-000131-Vq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 23:25:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHD1U-0005lS-2S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:25:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHCz8-0003TK-Mc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHCz8-0003jn-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHCz8-0005rp-7V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 42865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42865.159994577922529 (code B ref 42865); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 21:22:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHCz4-0005rJ-Mn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:22:58 -0400 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:50561) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHCz1-0005r3-G0 for 42865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:22:57 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A4C5C00BC; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:22:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 17:22:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=sKaEtj4NGh9RZm7XS7Vr0CZkR4 f66kVf2hMvCzqkSSk=; b=RK1JrqEl043mnpTTuy7ndCbyvrXm4ijvxvCfpSt3wn 8QYkb4L9wUGZSH8yYaPDeU7+JLNPxGUR4qCwqYvE9PlHYhmptZIFBZHPb6eZvWS1 JcH8YuJrmb87ekFOBUZm0Zkg9l71YPJGsUFcRdYn9JMBFn7XqeHsiOdLwL2J10Zq srmeP3fGlFQfcFWexnOEqr3UoJrSwwSTUo1cTLmVPAl0krei3g18i0M3qW5PatOx JKa9J8seThhtC2WGrWZtk8MRG389ik3fMFC1MjX14EdYHDBFsDACjgBkapPAvCfp E3IauLNH1vyKZd1LbfM35Zr1uRoHANQgdULbtf+3griA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=sKaEtj 4NGh9RZm7XS7Vr0CZkR4f66kVf2hMvCzqkSSk=; b=oBqoxLUzDDWPRF2bg3ib4l A5memnn+IsLipyXsU70wT2U8fRpgxaQ3x7mJBYF7Fbsc33R/X7vqjoKhXURGbDoD A4iEHSUQP7FL/erJHwI/n+sRi0cP2nkwiJp0p2OzEcD+ay4hMXgUlh7DO3Jk5dJR HG5ruC2hwy6Pt6iFsSRAFXsdDti9Zvu1et+gT7/yeNh3ZcyShIDy5Ja5i3Yqumah d2qUq4xUF/0BMShKyk4kfLmObzTD0kvTBqSY3W4k/vxzOLZ0wBR9gPA54rVWB8Lh GuKIkU+lBe88OZkD0OJpcskPRPX6fvq2QxuT+KyStgh467bGBAF12AMdU3IJHK1A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeiuddgudeivdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcu hghhihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedtvdehgeffhfffvdeffefhgfejffelhfetveffffektefg tdejtdeivddtveehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: <87mu1wzfsx.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187912 Archived-At: Hello, On Fri 11 Sep 2020 at 01:57PM +02, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> On Wed 19 Aug 2020 at 06:49PM +02, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> >>> Let's give it a few more days to see whether anybody else has any views >>> on this before committing, though. >> >> I think the patch could be applied, because the discussion between you >> and Juri about more involved possibilities, if it bears fruit, could >> become a different implementation of the new defcustom? > > That's true, but parts of your patch would then become superfluous, > wouldn't it? So it may be worth it to wait a bit more to see whether > the more general message suppression idea gets any traction... Fair enough, certainly happy to wait. As I think you realise, We'll still want some version of my patch for the blinking cursor suppression. -- Sean Whitton