From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45330: 28.0.50; debbugs-gnu: Can't select reports before having started Gnus Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:42:08 -0800 Message-ID: <87zgnz778v.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <877dpddqo1.fsf@web.de> <8735zzhi4w.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2hrfxcs.fsf@web.de> <877dpb6suo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tusd3i70.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sg7xrt82.fsf@web.de> <87tuscz974.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y250vu1f.fsf@gnus.org> <87czmbj3w4.fsf@web.de> <87o85urfxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtlelmpz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tufezgk6.fsf@web.de> <87r1a3ymdf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87czlcmwn6.fsf@web.de> <878rvkeenx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r19bst4u.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 45330@debbugs.gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:yggao+2s783pzAKMBiYCbIwvyYc= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 13 20:57:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n86E0-0000T6-CH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:57:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46506 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n86Dx-0005Fi-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8600-0005Dd-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zy-00070G-1y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zx-0006Wu-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <877dpddqo1.fsf@web.de> Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45330 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.164210295425057 (code B ref -1); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2022 19:42:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34650 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zW-0006W5-Jj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:42:34 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zS-0006Vu-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:42:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zS-0004Jb-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:42:30 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:40588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zR-0006xj-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:42:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n85zM-0002EW-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:42:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224129 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> In hindsight, there didn't need to be a `gnus-registry-enabled' boolean, >> we should have just been checking the existence of `gnus-registry-db', >> but I think it's too late to remove that boolean now. > > It's not used so often. And it makes things unnecessarily mixed-up. My > gut feeling says you should give it a try. Hmm, I suppose an obsolete variable alias wouldn't hurt, I doubt anyone's trying to do anything with `gnus-registry-enabled' besides checking it for truthiness.