From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57856: 28.2; bookmark context strings in encrypted files Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:19:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgeuf27w.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87bkrfh77i.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtaz8quf.fsf@gnus.org> <877d23h4df.fsf@gmail.com> <87czbv8od3.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1ujsbjp.fsf@gmx.de> <874jx56l2v.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtaxx8s7.fsf@gmx.de> <87leqfzu6j.fsf@gnus.org> <878rmfkaco.fsf@gmx.de> <87mtavvafd.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgevimog.fsf@gmx.de> <874jx3v8y7.fsf@gnus.org> <87v8pjikil.fsf@gmx.de> <8735cnryp6.fsf@gnus.org> <878rmegkx5.fsf@gmx.de> <87a66ucc7a.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4058"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 57856@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gustavo Barros Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 23:13:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oakYG-0000ug-Vr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:13:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35678 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oakYG-0006jC-12 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oafyd-0003gt-Ny for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oafyc-0008ET-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oafyc-0001FU-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57856 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57856-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57856.16636907674748 (code B ref 57856); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57856) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2022 16:19:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oafy3-0001EV-3q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:39485) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oafy1-0001EJ-SB for 57856@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:19:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1663690757; bh=AEWmyWD1sBbqK5yKtxmKpfevW1hwNUhFPOF8SiRsG80=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=aejFB4gpmeSu79AbM2D6Vc7W3cuwK59GdH0mOIZ2T/OhG7uW27jKlphFmy8yskoGE A0Rck6c7bQTD2yIzLwTQYdCRKPtJ+jy0fkYbnBpYNRXwUrVdvVB0JdhhiBiD0HwYCT qIg+Rz6SwyzSicktq9ozwMIz6P79VgpJdRMV8zJE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([79.140.125.182]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MlNtF-1ozWbR3PDx-00ljsj; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:19:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a66ucc7a.fsf@gmail.com> (Gustavo Barros's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:03:45 -0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:46HVLqfFigDnRNamlbBpZi1wLuCYOss3zTUN/YUkkJfjSPyfZrU ckrWbrbDS8LA+9ziH0IML53xurzu0uajgFZHHhxGO2Usk6vPC1yLcSaztESLacykNg2bqHg 9fgbIRX1BhTlUuQLqAj+fYqBzUZpdMRZ3mJ2afHlk1lhoNqCDXQKMxp9Ru+svY9QipNPIQA eV+jYiY4EVHshmc0/YeBQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WsLf1alJ5/Y=:Pkz5W+jlaZaLyZkWw/iosU hIuKi5ZlhIMvX/U9DeqMh2kED+PkY6V1Y+KQKDzB3IwgU+PyRogkTw/w/rgCV1Pdc3AyrrOMp bGtM/3QMuSmNizNZlGfKePsFdsFMczwCjCUHeV49J/2/6q5HQC8dXOUQIPqp7Su00nvAlQh64 jzBLteWVd93lzdX4zLmL7rNeATVV2/QqhFMdrCJnEcxPXIDSuRhbZ7JUxUBCzOfHbnMOzBRrH uYhA9/ZoJCY1qua4Aw5B4KLOkXBxt5dIPNC3evS/gb5xLtBG4AGlE2Odk0kfGTPAOtKYuF4T+ suBCaaRH7vWWYRMHagL0unYXdbKHd48mtauLwpNbpj4mWwvE5NYFTUbZOqclmfEyJu46C4C+t dRvbpf+6lG2fATxePXdnDzIJrR1RzKuUWfhE6cMZRhAh0eOdhGtWKY9BiDHR/iZjBQnwbvevG qxSETGVuWkrn5el9ewK8sQGsbt9b3Mb4DjBV9Lc3MqXRYYSAWORVyW0IMjsNYkc+IJXYCVjW7 icFm4ORlIeSI6/dM5o+qe8/hGvsCzIKUC/nERm7GXoGq48IET3R8FnKzlfoIN9MMRKXL+Il10 EXYTQ5vlicPphcqkAO0Sc1d/K9kWITpdNbgBF3OqkYFLOm1wmA066stYt5rnqr7EH3SDWAkxz GrDJK/ZhIwlKwPBrdPKr6jnCLRZVzYQspSE5WktZr8iRnVBNL+gD468CK0GmaurE0wxLAFV7d j58wxccqZayt7xbQ601wNgPA8TUyMjkQJK+GVYsxfn4eDrJVkxgh84yBJmUmCLqHQoI/oLOo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243228 Archived-At: Gustavo Barros writes: > Hi Michael, Hi Gustavo, > If I may, I do have a comment about the defcustom. I think > `bookmark-inhibit-bookmark-functions` is not really a precise name, > since it is not about inhibiting the bookmark itself, but only the > context strings. How about `bookmark-inhibit-context-functions`? On > the same vein, the docstring could be clearer about it. Say: > > "List of functions to call before making a bookmark record. > The functions take `buffer-file-name' as argument. If any of > these functions returns non-nil, the bookmark does not record > context strings from the current buffer." > > WDYT? Thanks, will apply both. I'm notoriously bad in giving names and writing documentation, so everything will help me! > Best regards, > Gustavo. Best regards, Michael.