From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:41:52 +0000 Message-ID: <87zg794ebz.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> <83edop6sdy.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5zblspg.fsf@posteo.net> <83ildz4vu7.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt3bk31e.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0smg2a6.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm86pgda.fsf@posteo.net> <838retee1z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 15 12:42:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pndMK-00019r-1I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 12:42:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pndM3-000451-HG; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pndM2-00044s-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pndM1-0002Mf-W4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pndM1-0000kh-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16815553212884 (code B ref 62720); Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2023 10:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pndM0-0000kR-Nb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:37211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pndLy-0000kD-CA for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 06:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B38240292 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 12:41:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1681555312; bh=v5GgzwU0ax49Rp6pnVxSso9ho3cfqXf11K1UrtemwCs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=n5TlJjdF/TdxKTyNWgrrOWYMvNpSAEtKH/RAS4f2nTEaTiTYPeTS41Wdhnf00H8bD F+psiCIEFWIwyyeTtZ4jTGT8mEop16Eh+ruc4FhiTALH3INpD9U5kK34x9xSW6mXmt 1vP6fgEXN0kK8Zn6gR4m8H9DEJjVZwoZ6okSkDCC0moLztpSQUeroMUp373nqp0QUt R1zMjbz6Npa/lgHaT0I7OwYuIarPEpR+rYuetoCnr/5Vr602jcxELWpP7g6Bdv7VrT H/3tSOrXPBA3sMs5I1nWs5rE61rXkoP1Q5TaQ0DXCWKCZMnbZe1k0F2xvUjmsCEu1D gy1lODfyUZNkQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Pz8y83WQ3z9rxH; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 12:41:52 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <838retee1z.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:37:44 +0300") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260021 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.= org, >> larsi@gnus.org >> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:40:01 +0000 >>=20 >> > Hmm... looks identical to the previous patch you sent, which changes >> > package-install? Or what am I missing? >> > >> > As for the question I asked: I'm okay with changing package-install if >> > there are no objections from those who proposed to change >> > package-upgrade instead. >>=20 >> Did I send the wrong patch. I double-checked now and this one should be >> using package-update: > > Thanks. It doesn't seem to be simpler than the change in > package-install, perhaps even more complex than that. > > What is your preference? change package-install or package-update? I > tend to the former. I have no preference either way. If you think that package-install is fine, and Jo=C3=A3o has expressed interest in that route as well, we might = as well go that way. --=20 Philip Kaludercic