From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2056: 23.0.60; Enabling flyspell degrades performance Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:07:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87y6u0mpzt.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 2056@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239906437 22466 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2009 18:27:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2056@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 16 20:28:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LuWIo-00038i-1l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:27:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LuWHP-0001IA-5V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LuWFj-0000lW-0Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:23:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LuWFe-0000jh-5C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:23:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49453 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LuWFe-0000jc-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:23:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:41324) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LuWFd-0005la-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:23:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3GINpj6031601; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:23:51 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n3GIF3oJ029172; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:15:03 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2056 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2056-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2056.123990514827767 (code B ref 2056); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2056) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Apr 2009 18:05:48 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3GI5jYF027761 for <2056@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:05:46 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7EC0357E24A; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:07:34 -0400 (EDT) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:23:58 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27252 Archived-At: > Following the recipe from bug#2717 on GNU/Linux shows a slowdown for > me too. If instead I do (as suggested in some other bug): > emacs -Q gall1.shtml > M-: (setq process-connection-type nil) RET > M-x flyspell-mode RET > > then the cursor movement is much better. Not perfect, but still > better. I see a slowdown, but the slowdown seems to be identical in Emacs 22 and Emacs 23. I suspect that flyspell is doing something silly (i.e., that the problem is in flyspell rather than Emacs core).