From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: bug#4883: 23.1; url-http: wrong server name used for pwd lookup during proxy authentication Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:20:31 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87y6lmoh4w.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87vdhinnxw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hbsiwtbz.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259682115 9416 80.91.229.12 (1 Dec 2009 15:41:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kai.tetzlaff@web.de To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 01 16:41:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFUpq-0004EH-Kh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:40:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44398 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFUpq-0008T8-13 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:40:14 -0500 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Trace: news.albasani.net OcGZ3KnyVxos7zuRH/BPHERGWJpBD1XIQqLLWOQPCP+OlMZbY0VCLSb0N2yN1AzVB6TtpyFFEO2LabT4U+XtveP20SWNHt42jiKADIfRbFjFbdEli5l1LuioqpTauhSG Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:20:31 +0000 (UTC) X-User-ID: SO7l8eMw4gLsLsQ56+1C6CtDPYEpOzebFXsdXLgCAIw= X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Cancel-Lock: sha1:boT1+/NPQuY7pEPgU61a39sajfs= sha1:K7K/WOsAd1F7u+k34thssqKO+rA= User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NNTP-Posting-Host: c0VjvXKb4TjARiQHZ5qpCdyj8Q4EBLCezXn6jq4dh2I= Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.bug:61495 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33114 Archived-At: On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:37:45 +0100 Kai Tetzlaff wrote: KT> On 25.11.2009 15:51, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:36:43 +0100 Kai Tetzlaff wrote: >> KT> I'm not sure why, but also my last post below never made it to the list. KT> I also sent it to you directly but did not get any reply so i assume KT> that it also got lost. I don't get why, but i'm trying again. >> >> No worries, this wasn't urgent :) >> KT> In addition to what i wrote below, i've now actually tested the url code KT> with a double auth. scenario (proxy auth + auth at url target). It KT> actually works fine without any further changes! >> >> Wonderful. >> KT> When you wrote your message suggesting to rework the patch, what problem KT> did you had in mind? Is there some other scenario which needs testing? >> >> I thought the double auth might be a problem because the code only takes >> into account the current auth. But it works, as you say, and I don't >> see any side effects. So I'm in favor of comitting your patch. I don't >> know if it's "trivial," however (meaning that it doesn't require >> copyright assignment papers). Do you want to propose it on emacs-devel >> or should I do it? Either way, you'll get an answer about the copyright >> papers :) KT> Thanks for your support and the offer to help with emacs-devel. Actually KT> Chong Yidong already added the patch to emacs CVS (there's a short note KT> about it at the very end of the 'Emacs bug Tracking System' post above). KT> So it seems to have been trivial enough :-). Wonderful, I didn't see that commit. I'm glad your change went in. Ted