From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15899: 24.3.50; regression: `region' overlay is lower priority than default Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:14:55 -0800 Message-ID: <87y51jd2o0.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <20137354-f982-4314-9c09-21a5fbc36557@default> <83ob5mi02j.fsf@gnu.org> <83bo1liv80.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392005830 24278 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 04:17:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15899@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 05:17:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiJ3-0002CF-HU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:17:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiJ3-0001Sy-43 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiIu-0001M6-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiIo-0001sb-Fs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiIo-0001sX-Cd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiIo-0002yY-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15899 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15899-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15899.139200578511372 (code B ref 15899); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15899) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 04:16:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiIC-0002xL-SB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:49572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiIA-0002xE-SI for 15899@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:16:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCiHw-0005lz-BI; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:16:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:25:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCiHw-0005lz-BI MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392610568.89263@Q17zRw3c5dNa9vZZIz3LUg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85177 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Isn't it confusing that the region highlighting is non-contiguous when >> an overlay is in its middle? > > 1- you need more than "an overlay in its middle": you need this overlay > to put a face property that happens to completely cancel the region's > own face properties (since the `face' properties of overlapping > overlays are merged). > 2- I don't think it's particularly confusing, no. Usually the context > makes it pretty clear, and if the user is surprised at some point, > that surprise will most likely not last very long. > So, no, I don't really think it's a bug. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/