From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15991: 24.3.50; Wishlist: Make test suite user-friendlier Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:24:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4wi6wie.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83pppk8f91.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhsjvgsa.fsf@gmx.de> <6osimru0uw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tx76stnl.fsf@gmx.de> <8738eq8bmx.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403893526 23558 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2014 18:25:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15991@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 27 20:25:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apo-0006NZ-3V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:25:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apn-00033n-KN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apf-000305-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apa-0008JS-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apa-0008JI-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apa-000763-9w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15991.140389349627261 (code B ref 15991); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2014 18:24:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apU-00075d-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:64049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0apR-00075P-C2 for 15991@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.53.250]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M936L-1WoBoh0roz-00CPHd; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:24:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8738eq8bmx.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:12:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:K6WjG0AlD8RhcBb4KddxYlwAgxfEUNPettTegh8ZyZr7U7tWPQq gV638gJZyngImBu+wyvJcZZrxWKS20rs1ugfek0uj/yiE5Lva+BXlsG2UiKhKkyE1hn8Y3c WjOXAO2q+rryU23EzGMo5ID13F7bKzx3WYxqKVnCePlRI9GBmNFDPOhMnRu4/eUYExvA7+d MTEPAzG20qBlwdLzW5oDg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90905 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > >>> I believe it is desirable to run the tests unconditionally when invoked >>> via make. People call "make check" for a reason. >> >> I suppose you are right, and this is consistent with how it used to behave. > > Nope. When you cal "make check" a second time, no test runs again, > 'cause the log files exist already. Forget this. I haven't seen your latest change. Thanks! Best regards, Michael.