From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: 20489@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20489: 25.0.50; next-error-find-buffer chooses non-current buffer without good reason
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 11:15:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4l3839e.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5548DC39.2090501@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 5 May 2015 18:05:29 +0300")
On Tue, 5 May 2015 18:05:29 +0300 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
DG> On 05/05/2015 01:33 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> Some history: I actually, long ago when `next-error' turned into a
>> navigation facility, we[1] had the idea of "meta next-error" which would
>> navigate one level higher than local. That would have made this whole
>> discussion, including rankings by priority, moot by simply saying "to
>> navigate between files (compile, grep) you use `meta-next-error' or
>> whatever it's called. to navigate inside file locations, use
>> `next-error'."
DG> Thanks for the link.
DG> That would've been an improvement, but it wouldn't solve a related
DG> problem: when *grep* buffer was created after a *compile* one, how to
DG> get back to using *compile*'s list of errors.
I think we have to accept the visible or last used one in that case.
>> Perhaps you are interested in adapting that code instead of hacking on
>> the current scheme? Or should I retry implementing it? 9 years late is
>> not too bad, right? :)
DG> 9 years is just right, but I'm not sure how much of that
DG> implementation we would reuse. It's also not obvious me how to move to
DG> the next file, if you only have a next-error-function.
I'm happy to make suggestions but please take this in a direction that
makes sense to you.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-02 23:17 bug#20489: 25.0.50; next-error-find-buffer chooses non-current buffer without good reason Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-03 5:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-03 12:56 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-04 22:03 ` Ted Zlatanov
2015-05-04 22:22 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-04 22:33 ` Ted Zlatanov
2015-05-05 15:05 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-05 15:15 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2016-01-24 21:10 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-25 6:23 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-25 21:55 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-25 23:36 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-27 0:57 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-27 2:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-27 22:57 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-27 23:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-28 23:59 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-29 0:35 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-29 23:44 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-30 0:57 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-30 23:43 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-31 0:39 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-01-31 21:57 ` Juri Linkov
2016-01-31 22:38 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-02 0:44 ` Juri Linkov
2016-02-02 1:40 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-03 0:35 ` Juri Linkov
2016-02-04 1:00 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-22 0:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-22 17:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-22 17:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-22 17:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-22 18:09 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-22 18:11 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-22 19:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-27 10:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-29 3:15 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-29 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-29 23:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-11-06 21:53 ` Juri Linkov
2018-02-15 22:16 ` Juri Linkov
2018-02-27 1:21 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-02-27 1:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-02-27 18:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-02-27 21:16 ` Juri Linkov
2018-02-28 2:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-02-28 21:17 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-02 1:19 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-03-06 22:17 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-07 14:11 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-03-07 21:11 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-12 22:08 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-02-28 21:25 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-01 22:58 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-02 1:26 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-03-06 22:25 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-07 14:08 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-03-07 21:03 ` Juri Linkov
2018-02-28 21:32 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-02 0:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-03-01 23:04 ` Juri Linkov
2018-03-02 1:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2018-02-28 17:33 ` Richard Stallman
2018-02-21 21:30 ` Juri Linkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4l3839e.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=20489@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).