From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Karpov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20943: 25.0.50; Dired buffers are not always auto-reverterd Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:02:19 +0600 Message-ID: <87y4ix75t0.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87y4j1oy87.fsf@openmailbox.org> <83bnfx2ckn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4j0fj8m.fsf@openmailbox.org> <831tgr3np9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3ort2bp.fsf@openmailbox.org> <83egkq1uj4.fsf@gnu.org> <87egkplmpw.fsf@openmailbox.org> <83wpyhzma4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8vdlguy.fsf@openmailbox.org> <83si95zbjr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435928787 3221 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2015 13:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:06:27 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii , <20943@debbugs.gnu.org> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 03 15:06:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0fT-0006f2-UQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:06:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0fS-0001rM-Vg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0fP-0001rG-26 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0fL-0000gm-T4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0fL-0000g8-Q0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0fK-0002ts-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:06:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Karpov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20943.143592875111127 (code B ref 20943); Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2015 13:05:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0f8-0002tO-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:05:50 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp3.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.37]:40869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZB0f4-0002tF-Jw for 20943@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA401201C72; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:05:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:date :references:subject:subject:from:from:received; s=openmailbox; t=1435928744; bh=BHiBnVDC4qO3Es00RVdCTBgCbtgqdArYC7ZE1KT2Trg=; b= uQBVyfpiW+IOwnornccfDXs9uW6fd2xJYDLJeWTXNsgomSs16vC3fk0ZIfvUyg1s eAGeZGS8PEY6AVD3qGUYxqakIZCowH2GBcSZaVpmyEpT45VqpWN7Lb91v82c+GrW bVl4DXYbUTbk88tNp8vx7nKOYgX7rBPvCNfFcUlmWto= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org Original-Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]) by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FpUIMpmHD0ni; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:05:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83si95zbjr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:10:48 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104652 Archived-At: Now I understand! What seemed to be random behavior is not that random. Obviously, =E2=80=98buffer-modified-p=E2=80=99 returns t if user pr= eviously modified directory, for example, if he deleted some files (I deleted some files before invocations of my script). Thus, =E2=80=98auto-revert-han= dle=E2=80=99 thinks that buffer is modified that it doesn't revert it. Now, this is good behavior for normal file buffers, but is it good enough for Dired buffers too? If I edited a Dired buffer, want it to stay in sync anyway. What do you think?