From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26589: Can't built Emacs from source (both master and 25.1 from tarball fail) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87y3uspdwt.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <83bmrpacni.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26co228.fsf@xi.bootis> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492880952 3435 195.159.176.226 (22 Apr 2017 17:09:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:09:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Cadadr , 26589@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F?= Kayaalp Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 19:09:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yWw-0000lW-FJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:09:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36302 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yX2-0007Em-Ag for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yWv-0007Dd-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yWs-0003ZE-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yWs-0003ZA-Bh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yWs-0000cj-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26589.14928808962345 (code B ref 26589); Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2017 17:08:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34632 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yW8-0000bg-6t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:36276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1yW5-0000bM-UU; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id x188so4783048itb.3; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 10:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N1DTOcSd3UIz/sp4dxLzNOMhk9zODVHDoDGvuuYcjrY=; b=mauzglH+CFVKjDmrqFA291/j+Cb201ofbB+A9y2dRLWIrrl36mq4OczXZCfDM9GUEV /CLUKNRKoRm6wj6vDTq26C4Epp15sAQLRRR+S/9BCV8q2LrPMwoTpgp76sLPSnQRhLv5 rnV7UfA1U02iuCKbs80rpRb2GDBnlzHDD1tsVBLa0ARddhSbtijxXaMcmswDxDhjALMk st8KZNjHMsiUjc5dAaYXm74QGSSTnBF/0onvJdzAYVlP+VVfZK4TDeRXhMcpwG/VmLho EfepEotjT72/8wmgmUlekr8bQY1BmRoIrVuQlEMvy5bTWu5z9m9QZxCVFkYi59nzeRBm 1bWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N1DTOcSd3UIz/sp4dxLzNOMhk9zODVHDoDGvuuYcjrY=; b=WL3HyvkLaw6+eZr/PQEPf4FyOVkkV7SQjfPt35hEExE2i+JbS2a2fW72fD07vMEJLn gJYInxWgYv0kqpZ8C67OWMAyAedIVHtUQJn9A7jc47n6lrCNF/WgTjQZsW60SmQNiP9v FZn74fn3iYJGh+0UBoPShFtWEXt/mThVFWUMf39Fh0rXctOCC5sk9p7HLAC/RMBaZSz7 ulqffpJ4FiIk82S3SLZ/KiWc6goWANNkRsfY4tM4B28Wf9N0jvyS0PmoPJp/4Cx5JO5F RwARnkv/UykVmK2euvfFozgLJ14SSAQ5Aq00D5gsggEIIPR0AlrevluwjPF/FQ5J0/36 ma0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6hopVjTLK6cchsLNO4qAY/JYmnV3VSyTxqoEmLJyShWigwbSuM hLzwnJCactk2NA== X-Received: by 10.36.65.68 with SMTP id x65mr4689051ita.117.1492880888420; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 10:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g76sm5524911ioj.48.2017.04.22.10.08.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 Apr 2017 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k26co228.fsf@xi.bootis> ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F?= Kayaalp"'s message of "Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:10:55 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131880 Archived-At: retitle 26589 Build error: TIT dictionary doesn=E2=80=99t have body part tags 26589 unreproducible close 26589=20 quit G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F Kayaalp writes: >> >> Try running configure with REL_ALLOC=3Dno. > > I've had to switch linux distros on my workstation (Xubuntu->Fedora), > and now the build completes perfectly, without errors. Not having > access to a Xubuntu installation, I can't reproduce or further debug > this issue, I'm sorry. > > But both OS's had GCC 6 on them, and maybe what caused the failure on > Xubuntu was a certain configuration of the compiler on that platform. > Again, I can't test the configuration variable on that system, please > excuse me. But on Fedora with GCC 6.3.1 and without REL_ALLOC=3Dno, Emacs > does compile. The segfault during building sounds like the rel_alloc thing; even if you can build 25.1 on Fedora without REL_ALLOC=3Dno it's probably just a coincidence. That build will likely crash later. But the other error must be something else. > I guess this bug report can be closed if there's nobody else that can > reproduce the problem. Again, sorry for the botherment. I searched for the error and found only this: https://qiang51.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/the-annoying-appledouble-file/ which seems to be about some (macOS specific?) incorrect unpacking of the sources. Anyway, closing for now, if it comes up again we can reopen.