From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: 19033@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19033: 25.0.50; (elisp) `Advising Named Functions' does not describe FUNCTION
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 03:46:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2xuwv15.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97aa8252-de9e-4a3d-9a79-4d080bc17aaa@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:11:47 -0800 (PST)")
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> This node sends you off to node `Core Advising Primitives' for
> information about parameters WHERE and PROPS.
>
> That's bad enough, since `Advising Named Functions' is intended as the
> MAIN entry point for advising functions:
>
> "But you should use `advice-add' and `advice-remove' for that instead."
>
> But `Advising Named Functions' tells you nothing about FUNCTION. In
> particular, it does not tell you what its signature must be or must fit.
>
> Worse still, neither does node `Core Advising Primitives' tell you
> anything about the signature of FUNCTION! So it would not even be
> enough to send readers to that node for information about FUNCTION,
> as we do now for WHERE and PROPS.
>
> What must FUNCTION accept as argument(s)? What must it return?
> If there are no restrictions on its signature, then say so.
If I understand correctly, what you want is that the
@defmac add-function where place function &optional props
in
@node Core Advising Primitives
should describe what parameters @var{function} takes in that macro.
That is indeed not described in that node, presumably because it's
complicated. Instead, we're directed to
@var{where} determines how @var{function} is composed with the
existing function, e.g., whether @var{function} should be called before, or
after the original function. @xref{Advice Combinators}, for the list of
available ways to compose the two functions.
where we find stuff like
@table @code
@item :before
Call @var{function} before the old function. Both functions receive the
same arguments
I think that makes sense -- trying to say anything about the parameters
before talking about @var{where} is pretty futile, because @var{where}
decides what parameters the function will receive.
So I don't see anything to fix here, and I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-12 17:11 bug#19033: 25.0.50; (elisp) `Advising Named Functions' does not describe FUNCTION Drew Adams
2019-10-09 1:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2xuwv15.fsf@gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=19033@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).