From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39115: 26.3; eww consecutive links look like one link with mouse-over Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:44:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2tzp6g4.fsf@gmx.net> References: <86imlfxu7t.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgk7ttca.fsf@gnus.org> <837e1jv4fa.fsf@gnu.org> <8736c7qp4x.fsf@gmx.net> <83r1zrthvn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="69627"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39115@debbugs.gnu.org, ynyaaa@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 21:45:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMsl-000I3l-0C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:45:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMsj-0000NO-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:45:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMs3-0000KX-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMs2-0006Z3-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMs2-0006Xe-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMs1-0001DH-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39115.15797258634603 (code B ref 39115); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2020 20:44:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51416 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMrO-0001CB-UA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:39045) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuMrM-0001Bx-FX for 39115@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:44:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579725853; bh=6SB9jI4gKMvOBXdt7Bgn8Q5wMlBeIjV6dDMgsDkiG+0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RQ3dBoao/w2Ac0H7vPR5sI3Zq6gm1zo0HUjI5F2ttw4wrfsryZ8MpBrDUvSu29cSV fW7wd/yAi6FrIiAAco3uwYreEgKJRr/sOhUAyq2KZo+3L/HKleyKkU70H8UR1r4mtF Ntu132GXcO6MSkIj+b8aKtWfRRI8HS/mASlO4lwk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobe-lfs84 ([94.220.123.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEm6F-1ioYMw0O3X-00GKvs; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:44:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83r1zrthvn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:23:40 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Aep3gXUEtzC+xyF/GfxYaFCHm5fIE5NXhGuIxriICEC7sJuF/kD yVfu1qs4Dq1mbtzHnfLvqn0EbDPbA8yShRtCB4AXmegX1LZlmD8QCp0VW6x96E1vVePQ/WE ooecOPIrPbi/60Z7mStuLCzsmfc68Rc29V/6t8FQaW2IjkAbI/7X861HkK8/9UTQXOsWVi+ r7ssYdnz1XXyKPxn2FK2g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qQDiye4h6nI=:KzVIcXgdjh1zFC2dJrkkE8 Mt6euSM6zMbGqIHlbFWEwV7WCkYaogPOyT/yy61QE2v0eLD1TgVvER6IagW1EjTOvZuRgbaxU PgFTigzJXALEQ+V1/rsPf/J5RUyiMSENeAyW+RHd0czYIR8tjdQhUIa1B/nymKCwWpFY7DGSa mFJAEnDusYoLe8X8spbeg1tHvIKBuWy0otLgm3fucnRYgZhkwqCJWb6RY3jU8t1qtySNfCqy8 apYDa7NUrXUs1ro7k5kuzXyc7az/dm2rWWd1nwwTD9iOhvvTYFo3sfOQb5Fs2nORLRy5HvwWH pRiE8QZTah3bJq0+hoTbswSVA1AQeqz6e/ygSNYR9PwZf1Id+gFSEANvIvh5WrTsJT9Iml7O+ xx0yJoJ8CJ1ZG24T1hT8REZOptxrt7dmS53C9mZQ2HeQik2Vow+tLi1f4CGoCe1ZNh4ZLsI3X NagLw924gM9ywBhF02F65QO3rXP++q3Z4b3CecwvaKWSdTf1WzI14CMjc/Tw+MJrEdnsWoRtk xpI2oGkhr1wK6t0O4tewc2QRhHGOS5MvQpWcrBHKsZaYMzcjV05b3WfV/M3dEMRdNBdl7hqzY G/MKFMo7a1QxYSxqI+xRYJsriuaGjmDRqBAYUJgeqIipp9+aJs8buMBi9NP4C26CwisOQqIwT sVwSulZEjYzXc1duoK7npjoT/B7WvUKUtmQRHRi54Iq/xjPusxj/xG8XEiooc3dgWKv3JtyoJ zcriNfqmXf3FI3u/jNkuLr5y7Rbmgk0ZXKfvP7kshobF1WSJXl+IHDdSMc2jygdIQ0vxcIvc X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175112 Archived-At: On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:23:40 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman >> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , ynyaaa@gmail.com, >> 39115@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:15:10 +0100 >> >> > Not without changes to C-level code, no. It currently traverses the >> > glyphs looking for the first one that doesn't have the mouse-face, so >> > if two stretches of text one after the other have that face, it won't >> > notice. >> >> That appears to be so only if the respective face values of the >> mouse-face properties have the same name; if the face names are >> different, even if one inherits from the other so they are visually >> indistinguishable, then each propertized string gets highlighted >> independently when the mouse pointer hovers over it > > That goes without saying, but I thought the request was for the > "normal" mouse face to be able to do that. It sounds a kludge to me > to ask that each button uses a different value of mouse-face, since it > means someone should construct each button by hand, and not generate > them by generic code. I also think it would only be worth considering if it could be programmed. But for buttons, it seems the problem does not arise: I just checked insert-button, and it uses overlays, which appear not to have the adjacency issue that text properties have: (progn (insert-button "one" 'mouse-face 'highlight) (insert-button "two" 'mouse-face 'highlight) (insert-button "three" 'mouse-face 'highlight)) Why do overlays and text properties differ on this? Steve Berman